首页> 外文期刊>Nursing inquiry >Crisis at Guy's Hospital (1880) and the nature of nursing work
【24h】

Crisis at Guy's Hospital (1880) and the nature of nursing work

机译:盖伊医院(1880年)和护理工作的性质危机

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This historical study aims to refine understanding of the nature of nursing work. The study focuses on the 1880 crisis at Guy's Hospital in London to examine the nature and meaning of nursing work, particularly the concept of nursing work as many ‘little things.’ In this paper, an examination of Margaret Lonsdale's writing offers an original contribution to our understanding of the ways in which nursing work differs from medical practice. In this way, we use the late‐nineteenth‐century controversy at Guy's Hospital as a prism through which to examine the contested nature of nursing work. Lonsdale's ideas are corroborated by examination of writings by nurse leaders Florence Nightingale and Eva Luckes. Luckes, in particular, elaborated what was meant by nursing as the performance of a thousand little things, which are specific to nursing work. While physicians had been performing much of what was considered to be nursing work, nurses developed some of these and other interventions into a unique body of work characterized by meticulous attention to significant details. Some implications regarding current nursing practice are discussed.
机译:这项历史研究旨在改进对护理工作本质的认识。这项研究侧重于伦敦盖伊医院的1880危机,探讨护理工作的性质和意义,特别是护理工作的概念,以及“小事”。在本文中,对玛格丽特Lonsdale的写作进行了一个原创贡献我们了解护理工作与医疗实践不同的方式。通过这种方式,我们使用19世纪末期的争论,在Guy的医院中作为棱镜,通过这是审查护理工作的有争议的性质。 Lonsdale的想法是通过护士领导者佛罗伦萨夜莺和伊娃幸运的作品来证实的。特别是幸运,阐述了护理的意思,作为千点小事的表现,这些都是针对护理工作的。虽然医生一直在表演被认为是护理工作的大部分内容,但护士都将其中一些和其他干预措施融入了一个独特的工作身体,其特征在于对重要细节的细微关注。讨论了关于当前护理实践的一些影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号