首页> 外文期刊>Evaluation & the health professions >Evaluation of Empowerment in Health Promotion Interventions: A Systematic Review
【24h】

Evaluation of Empowerment in Health Promotion Interventions: A Systematic Review

机译:促进健康促进干预措施赋权评估:系统审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although empowerment is one of the core principles of the World Health Organization's approach to health promotion, there are no standards, best practice recommendations, or guidelines for evaluating empowerment within interventions. For the development of effective empowerment promoting interventions, adequate study designs, methods, and indicators for assessing empowerment are essential. In order to better understand which evaluation procedures have been used so far, and which advantages and disadvantages are connected to them, we systematically reviewed empowerment-based health promotion interventions. We included 26 studies, which use a broad variety of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods designs and various data collection methods; qualitative and mixed-methods designs predominated. The quantitative measurement instruments are heterogeneous: Mainly self-designed or modified scales are applied. All studies consider indicators reflecting individual competencies and motivations, whereas indicators capturing the organizational and political components of empowerment are less common. Involving target group members in the development of evaluation procedures and combining different data sources are mentioned as specific steps to improve the quality of data collection. Given the flexible and context-dependent nature of empowerment approaches, the development of a "gold standard" for its evaluation seems unrealistic. However, the analyzed studies can be used to deduce recommendations that may help to conduct high-quality evaluations of empowerment, for example, mixed-methods designs, participation of target groups, and reflective loops within the research team.
机译:虽然赋权是世界卫生组织健康促进方法的核心原则之一,但没有标准,最佳实践建议或评估赋权在干预措施的指导方针。为了制定有效赋权的促进干预措施,评估赋权的适当研究设计,方法和指标至关重要。为了更好地了解到目前为止已经使用了哪些评估程序,我们系统地审查了基于赋权的健康促进干预措施的赋权的赋权。我们包括26项研究,它使用具有广泛的定量,定性和混合方法设计和各种数据收集方法;定性和混合方法设计占主导地位。定量测量仪器是异构的:主要应用自动设计或修改的尺度。所有研究都考虑了反映个人能力和动机的指标,而捕获赋权组织和政治组成部分的指标不太常见。涉及目标群成员在开发评估程序和结合不同的数据来源时被提到是改善数据收集质量的具体步骤。鉴于赋权方法的灵活性和上下文相关性,其评价的“黄金标准”的发展似乎不现实。然而,分析的研究可用于推断可能有助于对赋权进行高质量评估的建议,例如,混合方法设计,目标群体参与以及研究团队中的反思循环。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号