首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Development >Comparing and combining Social Network Analysis and Stakeholder Analysis for natural resource governance
【24h】

Comparing and combining Social Network Analysis and Stakeholder Analysis for natural resource governance

机译:对自然资源治理的社会网络分析与利益相关方分析的比较与结合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper, Social Network Analysis (SNA) and Stakeholder Analysis (SA) are utilized to identify the main stakeholders, evaluate their powers and interests, and demonstrate their relations in the Kan River Basin, Tehran, Iran. Their attributes are determined by the use of SA and their relations and connections are determined by the use of SNA. In the next step, five different classes for management of surface and groundwater in the study area are considered to draw social networks. Then, collaborative and conflictive formal (i.e. institutional) relationships between actors, and their intensity are investigated separately for each management class. The idea of independently considering collaborative and conflictive relations resulted in a better understanding of the governance system. Implementing the methodology for five different management classes and also regarding institutional relations by their nature and intensity provided more reliable results. In this paper, organizations are distinguished precisely, based on their own characteristics, and more importantly, their position in the system according to the others' perceptions. The combined use of SA and SNA for analyzing the governance of an environmental system has been done in a variety of scientific fields, but their results have never been compared to find probable correlations and analogies. In this paper, perhaps for the first time, a comprehensive statistical comparison between the results of SA and SNA is accomplished. An error index is also proposed for comparing the results of SA and SNA for the purpose of this research. Conclusions of the statistical analysis represent some rational and interesting correlations and similarities between the various features of these two well-known methods. Findings of the analysis can help to better understand the structure of these methods and to facilitate combining them in order to better analyze a complicated system of stakeholders.
机译:在本文中,利用社会网络分析(SNA)和利益相关者分析(SA)来识别主要利益攸关方,评估其权力和利益,并展示其在伊朗德黑兰汉江盆地的关系。它们的属性由使用SA确定,它们的关系和连接由SNA的使用决定。在下一步中,研究区域中的五种不同的类别和地下水的不同类别被认为是绘制社交网络。然后,参与者之间的协作和相互矛盾的正式(即机构)关系,每个管理课都分别调查他们的强度。独立考虑协作和互连的关系的想法导致了对治理系统的更好理解。通过其性质和强度实施五种不同管理课程的方法,以及其性质和强度的制度关系提供了更可靠的结果。在本文中,基于自己的特征,各组织的特点是根据其他人的特征来区分,更重要的是,根据其他人的看法,他们在系统中的立场。 SA和SNA合并使用SA和SNA用于分析环境系统的治理,已经在各种科学领域完成,但它们的结果从未被比较以找到可能的相关性和类比。在本文中,也许是第一次,完成了SA和SNA的结果之间的全面统计比较。还提出了一种错误指数,用于比较SA和SNA的结果以获得本研究。结论统计学分析代表了这两个众所周知的方法的各种特征之间的一些理性和有趣的相关性和相似性。分析的结果可以帮助更好地理解这些方法的结构,并促进组合它们,以便更好地分析一个复杂的利益攸关方体系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号