...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation >Comparison of metabolic cost and cardiovascular response to stair ascending and descending with walkers and canes in older adults
【24h】

Comparison of metabolic cost and cardiovascular response to stair ascending and descending with walkers and canes in older adults

机译:在老年人中,使用沃克和手杖的代谢成本和心血管反应的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective To compare oxygen cost (mL·kg-1·m -1) and cardiovascular response (beats/m) and oxygen consumption (mL·kg-1·min-1) and heart rate (beats/min) to stair ascending and descending with walkers, with canes, and without assistive devices (ADs) in older adults. Design Descriptive, repeated measures. Setting Indoor stairway. Participants Convenience sample of able-bodied volunteers, non-AD users (N=14; mean age, 63.71±11.7y; mean body mass, 72.7±14.1kg; mean height, 165.7±9.2cm). Interventions Participants performed 4 randomized trials of stair ascending and descending at their own self-selected speed with 3 ADs: single-point cane, standard walker (SW), and wheeled walker (WW). They also performed unassisted stair ascending and descending. Each trial consisted of a 5-minute steady-state session followed by a 2-minute data collection period. Steady-state expired ventilations were collected in Douglas bags for metabolic analysis. Main Outcome Measures Oxygen cost (mL·kg-1·m-1), heart rate (HR) response (beats/m), oxygen consumption (mL·kg-1·min -1), and HR (beats/min) were compared for each trial of stair ascending and descending using analysis of variance repeated measures (P.05). Results Greater oxygen cost (per meter) was found for stair ascending and descending using the single-point cane (121%), SW (217%), and WW (232%) compared with unassisted stair ascending and descending (P.05). Increased HR response (per meter) was found for stair ascending and descending using the single-point cane (116%), SW (126%), and WW (147%) compared with unassisted stair ascending and descending (P.05). However, oxygen consumption (per minute) and HR (per minute) were not significantly increased during stair ascending and descending with the ADs compared with unassisted stair ascending and descending. Participants stair ascended and descended at significantly (P.05) reduced speeds during trials with the ADs. Conclusions This research should aid clinicians by providing evidence to base recommendations on regarding AD usage when encountering stairs during home and community ambulation.
机译:目的将氧气成本(ml·kg-1·m -1)和心血管反应(Beats / m)和氧气消耗(ml·kg-1·min-1)和心率(beats / min)进行比较和心率(beak / min)。随着携带舞者,戴着手杖和老年人的辅助设备(广告)降序。设计描述性,重复措施。设置室内楼梯。参与者便利样本能够身体志愿者,非广告用户(n = 14;平均年龄,63.71±11.7y;平均体积,72.7±14.1kg;平均高度,165.7±9.2cm)。干预措施参与者在使用3个广告:单点拐杖,标准步行者(SW)和轮式助行器(WW)上进行了阶段上升和下降的随机试验。他们还表现出独立的楼梯上升和下降。每次试验包括5分钟的稳态会话,然后包括2分钟的数据收集期。在道格拉斯袋中收集稳态过期的通风,进行代谢分析。主要结果测量氧气成本(ML·KG-1·M-1),心率(HR)响应(BEAK / M),氧气消耗(ML·KG-1·MIN -1),以及HR(BEAKS / MIN)比较每次试验阶段上升和使用方差分析重复措施的分析(P <.05)。结果与单点拐杖(121%),SW(217%)和WW(232%)相比,使用单点拐杖(121%),SW(232%)进行阶段上升和下降的氧气成本(每米)。(P <.05 )。与无统计阶段上升和下降相比,使用单点甘蔗(116%),SW(126%)和WW(147%)进行阶段上升和下降的HR响应(每米)增加。 。然而,在阶梯上升和随意下降的情况下,氧气消耗(每分钟)和人力资源(每分钟)并没有显着增加,与广告相比,与非批准的楼梯上升和下降相比。参与者楼梯升起并显着下降(P <.05)在与广告的试验期间减少速度。结论本研究应该通过向临床教师提供基本建议,根据在家庭和社区救护期间遇到楼梯时向广告使用提供证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号