...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta oncologica. >Prospective comparative study of F-18-sodium fluoride PET/CT and planar bone scintigraphy for treatment response assessment of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer
【24h】

Prospective comparative study of F-18-sodium fluoride PET/CT and planar bone scintigraphy for treatment response assessment of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer

机译:前列腺癌患者骨转移治疗骨转移治疗响应评估的近期比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Aim: To compare F-18-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography (NaF PET/CT) and Tc-99m-labelled diphosphonate bone scan (BS) for the monitoring of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer undergoing anti-cancer treatment.Material and methods: Data from 64 patients with prostate cancer were included. The patients received androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), next-generation hormonal therapy (NGH) or chemotherapy. The patients had a baseline scan and 1-3 subsequent scans during six months of treatment. Images were evaluated by experienced nuclear medicine physicians and classified for progressive disease (PD) or non-PD according to the Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 (PCWG-2) criteria. The patients were also classified as having PD/non-PD according to the clinical and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) responses.Results: There was no difference between NaF PET/CT and BS in the detection of PD and non-PD during treatment (McNemar's test, p=.18). The agreement between BS and NaF PET/CT for PD/non-PD was moderate (Cohen's kappa 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.26-0.79). Crude agreement between BS and NaF PET/CT for the assessment of PD/non-PD was 86% (89% for ADT, n=28; 88% for NGH, n=16, and 80% for chemotherapy, n=20). In most discordant cases, BS found PD when NaF PET/CT did not, or BS detected PD on an earlier scan than NaF PET/CT. Biochemical progression (27%) occurred more frequently than progression on functional imaging (BS, 22% and NaF PET/CT, 14%). Clinical progression was rare (11%), and almost exclusively seen in patients receiving chemotherapy.Conclusion: There was no difference between NaF PET/CT and BS in the detection of PD and non-PD; however, BS seemingly detects PD by the PCWG-2 criteria earlier than NaF-PET, which might be explained by the fact that NaF-PET is more sensitive at the baseline scan.
机译:目的:比较F-18-氟化钠正电子发射断层扫描/计算断层扫描(NAF PET / CT)和TC-99M标记的二膦酸酯骨扫描(BS),用于监测患有抗癌治疗的前列腺癌患者患者中的骨转移。材料和方法:包括64例前列腺癌患者的数据。患者接受雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT),下一代荷尔蒙治疗(NGH)或化疗。患者在六个月治疗期间患有基线扫描和1-3次扫描。通过经验丰富的核医学医生评估图像,并根据前列腺癌工作组2(PCWG-2)标准分类为渐进性疾病(PD)或非PD。根据临床和前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)反应,患者也被分类为具有PD /非PD。结果:NAF PET / CT和BS在治疗期间检测PD和非Pd中没有差异(麦克尼马尔的测试,p = .18)。 BS和NAF PET / CT的协议PD /非PD为中等(COHEN的Kappa 0.53,95%置信区间0.26-0.79)。 BS和NAF PET / CT之间的粗略协议用于评估Pd /非Pd / adt的评估(ADT的89%,N = 28; NGH,N = 16,化疗的88%,N = 20) 。在大多数不安的病例中,BS发现了当NAF PET / CT没有的PD,或者在比NAF PET / CT上的早期扫描上检测到PD。生物化学进展(27%)比功能性成像(BS,22%和NAF PET / CT,14%)更频繁地发生。临床进展是罕见的(11%),并且在接受化疗的患者中几乎完全见到。结论:NAF PET / CT和BS检测到PD和非Pd中没有差异;然而,BS似乎通过比NAF-PET的PCWG-2标准似乎检测到PD,这可能通过NAF-PET对基线扫描更敏感的事实来解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号