首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology >Comparing intravenous and oral proton pump inhibitor therapy for bleeding peptic ulcers following endoscopic management: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Comparing intravenous and oral proton pump inhibitor therapy for bleeding peptic ulcers following endoscopic management: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:静脉和口服质子泵抑制剂治疗对内窥镜管理后出血性溃疡的抑制作用:系统审查与荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background and AimsThe efficacy of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) has been demonstrated for bleeding peptic ulcers but the route of administration remains controversial. Several studies have demonstrated that high-dose oral PPIs are as effective as intravenous PPIs in reducing recurrent bleeding. However, current guidelines recommend intravenous PPIs after endoscopic treatment. Previous data based on numbers that were too small to enable a firm conclusion to be reached suggested that oral and intravenous PPIs had equivalent efficacy. We undertook a meta-analysis to compare oral and intravenous PPIs in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers after endoscopic management.
机译:已经证明了质子泵抑制剂(PPI)的背景和AIMSTHE功效用于出血性消化溃疡,但行为途径仍然存在争议。 几项研究表明,高剂量口服PPI在降低复发出血时与静脉内PPI有效。 但是,当前指南建议在内窥镜治疗后静脉注射PPI。 以前的数据基于无法达到坚实的结论的数字,表明口腔和静脉注射PPI具有等同的功效。 我们进行了荟萃分析,以比较内镜管理后出血性消化溃疡的口腔和静脉注射PPI。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号