...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Authors' reply
【24h】

Authors' reply

机译:作者的回信

获取原文
           

摘要

We agree with Flora van Leeuwen and colleagues that the Dutch collective settlement has its merits, but avoiding lengthy court procedures is not one of them In 1986, six DES daughters started the first court case in the Netherlands against ten companies In 1992 it was abandoned in anticipation of the outcome of the negotiations for this collective settlement Ultimately, however, the agreement was not reached until November, 2005, and was only confirmed by the Court of Amsterdam in June, 2006 If, 14 years earlier, the courts had ruled in favour of the original six plaintiffs, compensation settlements would probably have followed for others without the need for expensive court procedures
机译:我们同意Flora van Leeuwen及其同事的观点,即荷兰集体解决方案是有其优点的,但避免冗长的法院程序并不是其中之一。1986年,六个DES女儿在荷兰针对10家公司提起了第一起法庭诉讼。1992年,它被放弃了。期待集体解决方案的谈判结果最终,该协议直到2005年11月才达成,直到2006年6月阿姆斯特丹法院才确认。如果14年前,法院裁定胜诉,在最初的六个原告中,其他人可能会遵循赔偿和解协议,而无需昂贵的法院程序

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号