【24h】

Editorial comment

机译:编辑评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Most experts agree that patients with renal trauma who are not exsanguinating from the kidney are best treated with a conservative approach.1 This appears to be the case for blunt trauma, stab wounds and even some gunshot wounds in adults and children. The major question that is just starting to be answered concerns how many patients will require delayed intervention after an initially conservative approach. The answer to this question is an important point from this series. Of children with high grade renal injuries treated conservatively 11% will still require nephrectomy and 7% will require additional urological procedures (mostly ureteral stents and angioembolizations). The careful practitioner will be vigilant for the need to intervene when necessary, even after an initially conservative approach.
机译:大多数专家都认为,最好通过保守方法对没有从肾脏抽血的肾外伤患者进行治疗。1成人和儿童的钝性外伤,刺伤甚至枪弹伤似乎都是这种情况。刚开始要回答的主要问题是,最初采用保守方法后,有多少患者需要延迟干预。这个问题的答案是本系列的重要内容。保守治疗的高度肾损伤患儿中,仍有11%仍需要进行肾切除术,而7%则需要进行其他泌尿外科手术(主要是输尿管支架和血管栓塞术)。细心的从业者将警惕是否有必要在必要时进行干预,即使是在最初采取保守措施之后也是如此。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号