首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Reply by the authors
【24h】

Reply by the authors

机译:作者的答复

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The authors report a well-tolerated procedure in all patients. One may be skeptical about this for many reasons. First, the objective criteria for failure or inadequacy of LA and aborting the procedure (if required) were not defined. These could have been either level or duration of intra-operative pain or frequency oT top-up instillations of LA and sedation.. Intraoperative tolerance was judged subjectively. Patients were prepared for intraoperative potential pain by preoperative explanation. Apart from the increasing pain threshold, this may also increase chances of a biased subjective reporting of pain scores (reporting them lower) and tolerability (reporting it good). Second, the study reports a definite intraoperative pain with a mean score of 3.62.
机译:作者报告所有患者的手术耐受性良好。出于多种原因,人们可能对此表示怀疑。首先,没有确定LA失败或不足以及中止手术(如果需要)的客观标准。这些可能是术中疼痛的程度或持续时间,或者是LA滴加和镇静的频率。术中耐受性是主观判断的。通过术前解释为患者准备术中潜在的疼痛。除了增加疼痛阈值外,这还可能增加主观报告疼痛评分(报告较低)和耐受性(报告良好)的机会。其次,该研究报告了术中明确的疼痛,平均评分为3.62。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号