...
首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Reply by the authors
【24h】

Reply by the authors

机译:作者的答复

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We appreciate the interest and congratulations of the authors of this letter to the editor. The aim of our study was evaluation of long-term renal functional outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) for calculi in solitary kidneys by measuring the differences in preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values and those during follow-up.1 The authors of this letter are raising another important question. What is the best imaging protocol for evaluation of the stone-free status after PNL in patients with solitary kidneys? This is crucial in patients with solitary kidneys because it was reported that residual fragments of 5 mm or less after PNL should be expected to require active intervention in one-third of the patients at intermediate follow-up.
机译:我们感谢这封信的作者对编辑的关注和祝贺。本研究的目的是通过测量术前估计的肾小球滤过率(eGFR)值与随访期间肾结石的经皮肾镜取石术(PNL)长期肾功能预后评估结石的结石。1这封信提出了另一个重要问题。评估孤立肾脏患者PNL后无结石状态的最佳影像学方案是什么?这对于单肾患者至关重要,因为据报道,在进行中间随访时,应预期PNL后5 mm或更小的残余碎片需要积极干预。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Urology》 |2014年第3期|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号