...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical microbiology and infection: European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases >Evaluation of a cefoxitin disk diffusion test for the routine detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
【24h】

Evaluation of a cefoxitin disk diffusion test for the routine detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

机译:头孢西丁纸片扩散试验对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的常规检测的评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Two oxacillin disk methods were compared with a cefoxitin disk diffusion test for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), with PCR for mecA as the reference method. When tested with 115 MRSA and 350 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus isolates, the cefoxitin disk test (specificity 100%, sensitivity 96.5%) was superior to the oxacillin disk methods (specificity 99.1%, sensitivity 90.4%). Testing with both oxacillin and cefoxitin disks would give better sensitivity (100%) than the cefoxitin test alone, but at the expense of specificity (99.1%). The cefoxitin disk test required no special test conditions and would improve the reliability of routine tests for detection of MRSA.
机译:摘要比较了两种奥沙西林圆盘法与头孢西丁圆盘扩散法检测耐甲氧西林的金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA),以PCR检测mecA为参考方法。当用115种MRSA和350种对甲氧西林敏感的金黄色葡萄球菌进行测试时,头孢西丁圆盘试验(特异性100%,灵敏度96.5%)优于奥沙西林圆盘试验(特异性99.1%,灵敏度90.4%)。用奥沙西林和头孢西丁圆片进行测试会比单独使用头孢西丁测试获得更高的灵敏度(100%),但会牺牲特异性(99.1%)。头孢西丁圆盘测试不需要特殊的测试条件,并且可以提高用于检测MRSA的常规测试的可靠性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号