...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Surgeons >Differences in hospital performance for noncancer vs cancer colorectal surgery
【24h】

Differences in hospital performance for noncancer vs cancer colorectal surgery

机译:非癌与癌性结直肠手术的医院表现差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Considerable hospital-to-hospital variations in surgical outcomes have been reported across surgical procedures. However, it is unclear whether hospital quality rankings are consistent for noncancer and cancer operations. We investigated the differences in hospital performance for noncancer and cancer colorectal resections at 52 hospitals participating in the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative (MSQC). Study Design Patients undergoing colorectal resections between 2008 and 2012 were identified. Hierarchical risk-adjusted models were used to evaluate hospital level 30-day morbidity, major morbidity, extended length-of-stay (LOS 75th percentile), and mortality outcomes. Hospital performance, as ranked by observed-to-expected ratios, was compared by rank-order changes, interquartile ranges (IQR), and Spearman's correlations. Results Of the 19,990 colorectal resections, 7,292 (36.5%) were for cancer. We observed wide variations in all risk-adjusted 30-day outcomes between hospitals, but only weak correlations in cancer and noncancer performance within hospitals. Overall hospital performance in mortality after noncancer and cancer operations was not correlated (Spearman's rho: 0.02). Of the best performing hospitals in mortality after noncancer resections, 69% were reclassified to a worse quartile for cancer operations (median rank-change of 12.5 ranks [IQR 5 to 27]). Similarly, hospital performance in morbidity was only moderately correlated (rho: 0.59; p 0.001). Of the hospitals with lowest morbidity rates for noncancer resections, 31% were reclassified. We noted a similar lack of relationship in major morbidity and extended LOS. Conclusions A hospital's performance ranking in risk-adjusted outcomes after noncancer colorectal resections does not correlate to its performance for cancer-related colorectal resections. Indication for operation should be considered when leveraging risk-adjusted hospital outcomes for quality improvement efforts.
机译:背景技术据报道,整个手术过程中医院到医院的手术结局差异很大。但是,尚不清楚非癌症和癌症手术的医院质量等级是否一致。我们调查了密歇根州外科质量合作组织(MSQC)参与的52家医院在非癌性和癌性大肠切除术中医院表现的差异。研究设计确定了在2008年至2012年之间接受大肠切除术的患者。分层风险调整模型用于评估医院的30天发病率,主要发病率,延长的住院时间(LOS> 75%百分位数)和死亡率。通过观察值与预期值的比率对医院的绩效进行比较,并通过等级顺序变化,四分位间距(IQR)和Spearman相关性进行比较。结果在19,990例大肠切除术中,有7,292例(36.5%)为癌症。我们观察到医院之间所有经过风险调整的30天结果之间存在很大差异,但是医院内癌症和非癌表现之间的相关性很小。医院在非癌症和癌症手术后死亡率的总体表现没有相关性(Spearman的rho:0.02)。在非癌症切除术后死亡率最高的医院中,有69%的医院因癌症手术而被重新分类为较差的四分位数(中位等级变化为12.5级[IQR 5至27])。同样,发病率的医院表现也只有中等程度的相关性(rho:0.59; p <0.001)。在非癌症切除发病率最低的医院中,有31%被重新分类。我们注意到在主要发病率和长期服务水平上也缺乏相似的关系。结论一家医院在非癌性结直肠癌切除术后风险调整后结局中的表现等级与其在癌症相关的结直肠癌切除中的表现无关。当利用经过风险调整的医院结果进行质量改进时,应考虑手术指征。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号