...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Stored Products Research >Effects of weather conditions on sulfuryl fluoride and methyl bromide leakage during structural fumigation in a flour mill.
【24h】

Effects of weather conditions on sulfuryl fluoride and methyl bromide leakage during structural fumigation in a flour mill.

机译:天气条件对面粉厂结构熏蒸过程中硫酰氟和甲基溴泄漏的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A validated Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model of structural fumigation was used to perform 54 fumigation simulations (half with sulfuryl fluoride, SF, and half with methyl bromide, MB) using recorded hourly average weather data for 4 July and 1 September at Indianapolis International Airport for the years 1996-2006. These weather data were used as the simulation boundary conditions. Although the fumigations were simulated for the same time periods, the results indicated substantial variations in the fumigant leakage rates. The 11-year averages of wind speeds on 4 July and 1 September were 3.8 and 2.4 m/s, respectively, resulting in half-loss time (HLT) differences between the fumigations on the two days. On average, the HLT was 4 h lower on 4 July than on 1 September. When comparing the results between individual fumigations, substantial differences in the fumigant leakage were observed, regardless of the fumigant type and whether or not the fumigations were performed at the same time period. This implied that using past fumigation data as the primary means for evaluating the structural sealing quality of a current fumigation is not adequate. Predictions of fumigant leakage rate and fumigation performance should incorporate quantifiable sealing effectiveness and weather information for the planned fumigation period. Comparisons between SF and MB fumigations indicated that under exactly the same weather conditions and fumigation practices the leakage characteristics of SF and MB do not differ. In practical situations where the dosage requirements for SF and MB are typically not the same, however, the leakage rates of SF and MB fumigations could be different due to the buoyancy effect. Nevertheless, the magnitude of the difference may or may not be significant depending on other factors such as sealing quality, wind speed and direction, and ambient temperature. The effects of these factors should be further quantified. All rights reserved, Elsevier.
机译:使用经验证的结构熏蒸计算流体动力学(CFD)模型,使用记录的7月4日和9月1日在印第安纳波利斯国际机场的每小时平均天气数据,执行54次熏蒸模拟(一半为磺酰氟,SF,一半为甲基溴,MB)。机场为1996-2006年。这些天气数据被用作模拟边界条件。尽管对熏蒸进行了相同时间的模拟,但结果表明熏蒸剂泄漏率存在很大差异。 7月4日和9月1日的11年平均风速分别为3.8 m / s和2.4 m / s,导致两天熏蒸之间的半损失时间(HLT)差异。平均而言,7月4日的HLT比9月1日的HLT低4小时。比较各个熏蒸的结果时,无论熏蒸剂的类型以及熏蒸是否同时进行,都观察到熏蒸剂泄漏的实质性差异。这意味着使用过去的熏蒸数据作为评估当前熏蒸结构密封质量的主要手段是不够的。熏蒸剂泄漏率和熏蒸性能的预测应纳入计划熏蒸期的可量化密封效果和天气信息。 SF和MB熏蒸的比较表明,在完全相同的天气条件和熏蒸实践中,SF和MB的泄漏特性没有差异。但是,在实际情况下,SF和MB的剂量要求通常不相同,但由于浮力作用,SF和MB熏蒸的泄漏率可能会有所不同。但是,取决于其他因素(例如密封质量,风速和方向以及环境温度),差异的大小可能很大也可能不会很大。这些因素的影响应进一步量化。保留所有权利,Elsevier。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号