首页> 外文期刊>Biomedical sciences instrumentation >A quantitative comparison between manual segmentation and threshold-based segmentation of CLSM recorded images.
【24h】

A quantitative comparison between manual segmentation and threshold-based segmentation of CLSM recorded images.

机译:CLSM记录图像的手动分割和基于阈值的分割之间的定量比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Segmentation is the process of defining distinct objects in an image. Object segmentation of two-dimensional images is often accomplished by a time consuming manual process where trained persons trace a line along the boundary of the object. Significant effort has been directed towards various computer segmentation algorithms to reduce the time required to segment each object. Often the question arises as to the accuracy of the computer segmentation results. This paper makes a quantitative comparison between the segmented object from a threshold-based computer segmentation process and the manual segmentation results from a group of volunteers. This comparison is based on the fact that humans have an intuitive capability to recognize objects. The image sample used in this report is a portion of the brain of the common housefly, Musca domestica. The very small size of the object makes it impractical to compare the computer segmentation results to the actual object.
机译:分割是在图像中定义不同对象的过程。二维图像的对象分割通常是通过耗时的手动过程完成的,在该过程中,受过训练的人员沿着对象的边界跟踪一条线。为了减少分割每个对象所需的时间,已经对各种计算机分割算法进行了大量的努力。通常会出现关于计算机分割结果准确性的问题。本文对基于阈值的计算机分割过程中的分割对象与一组志愿者的手动分割结果进行了定量比较。这种比较是基于人类具有识别物体的直观能力这一事实。本报告中使用的图像样本是普通家蝇Musca domestica的一部分大脑。对象的尺寸非常小,因此无法将计算机分割结果与实际对象进行比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号