首页> 外文期刊>Journal of neurointerventional surgery >Comparison of techniques for stent assisted coil embolization of aneurysms
【24h】

Comparison of techniques for stent assisted coil embolization of aneurysms

机译:支架辅助动脉瘤线圈栓塞技术的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: Stent assisted coiling (SAC) of aneurysms has been adopted with potential mechanical, hemodynamic and biologic properties imparting an advantage over coil embolization alone. The purpose of this investigation is to compare the various techniques of SAC at a single institution with regards to clinical, technical and angiographic complications and success. Methods: Patients who underwent SAC between 2003 and 2010 were identified. Clinical charts, procedures, angiographic and non-invasive radiological images were analyzed to determine the anatomical and procedural details and adverse events. Immediate post-procedural angiograms as well as follow-up imaging were studied to assess the degree of aneurysm occlusion. Results: 260 aneurysms were identified. The 'coil through' technique was employed in 37.3%, 'balloon stent' in 36.2%, 'jailing' in 10.8% and the 'coil stent' technique in 7.7%. Overall rate of adverse events was higher with the 'coil stent' and 'jailing' techniques compared with the 'balloon stent' technique. The 'coil through' technique was associated with a significantly lower packing density (31.4 ± 20%) than all other techniques ('coil stent' 45.4 ± 22%, 'jailing' 42.2 ± 20%, 'balloon stent' 44.3 ± 22%). Among 'coil stent' patients, an initial Raymond class 1 was achieved in 40%, compared with 57% of 'jailing', 28% of 'coil through' and 63% of 'balloon stent' cases. Conclusion: Balloon assisted coil embolization followed by adjunctive stent deployment across the aneurysm neck appears to be the superior technique among stent assisted coiling methods at our institution. It combines a lower rate of thrombotic and coil related complications with a high rate of complete occlusion on initial and follow-up imaging.
机译:简介:动脉瘤的支架辅助线圈(SAC)已被采用,具有潜在的机械,血液动力学和生物学特性,与单纯线圈栓塞相比具有优势。这项研究的目的是比较单一机构在临床,技术和血管造影并发症及成功方面的各种SAC技术。方法:确定2003至2010年接受SAC的患者。分析临床图表,程序,血管造影和非侵入性放射学图像,以确定解剖学和程序细节以及不良事件。研究人员对术后立即进行血管造影以及随访影像学检查以评估动脉瘤的闭塞程度。结果:鉴定出260个动脉瘤。 37.3%的采用“直通”技术,36.2%的采用“气囊支架”技术,10.8%的采用“监牢”技术,而7.7%的采用“线圈支架”技术。与“气囊支架”技术相比,“线圈支架”和“监狱”技术的总不良事件发生率更高。与所有其他技术(“线圈支架” 45.4±22%,“监狱” 42.2±20%,“气球支架” 44.3±22%)相比,“直通”技术的装填密度(31.4±20%)显着降低)。在“线圈支架”患者中,最初的雷蒙德1级达到了40%,而“监狱”患者的这一比例为57%,“线圈穿过”的患者为28%,“气球支架”的患者为63%。结论:在我们机构中,球囊辅助线圈栓塞术以及辅助支架在整个动脉瘤颈内的展开似乎是支架辅助卷绕方法中的一项优越技术。它结合了较低的血栓形成和线圈相关并发症发生率,以及在初次和后续影像学检查中完全闭塞的高发生率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号