首页> 外文期刊>Journal of minimally invasive gynecology >Laparoscopy for the management of early-stage endometrial cancer: from experimental to standard of care.
【24h】

Laparoscopy for the management of early-stage endometrial cancer: from experimental to standard of care.

机译:腹腔镜治疗早期子宫内膜癌:从实验到标准护理。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We performed a search of PUBMED and MEDLINE for articles concerning surgical management of early stage endometrial cancer from 1950 to 2011. From the articles collected we extracted data such as estimated blood loss, operating room time, complications, conversion to laparotomy, and length of hospital stay. Forty-seven relevant sources were analyzed. The patients in the laparoscopy group had less blood loss, fewer complications, longer operating room times, and a shorter length of stay. Lymph node count was similar in both groups. Although obesity is not a contraindication to laparoscopy, it does lead to a higher conversion rate. Route of surgical treatment had no impact on recurrence or survival. Robotic surgery has significant advantages over laparotomy, but advantages over laparoscopy are not as distinct. Laparoscopic hysterectomy offers several advantages over laparotomy. These advantages relate to improvements in patient care with comparable clinical outcome. After careful analysis we believe laparoscopy should be the standard of care for surgical management of early stage endometrial cancer.
机译:我们对PUBMED和MEDLINE进行了搜索,以查找有关1950年至2011年早期子宫内膜癌手术治疗的文章。从收集的文章中,我们提取了一些数据,例如估计的失血量,手术时间,并发症,开腹手术和住院时间留。分析了47个相关来源。腹腔镜检查组的患者失血量少,并发症少,手术室时间长,住院时间短。两组的淋巴结计数相似。尽管肥胖症不是腹腔镜检查的禁忌症,但确实会导致更高的转化率。手术途径对复发或生存无影响。机器人手术相对于剖腹手术具有明显的优势,但相对于腹腔镜检查的优势并没有那么明显。腹腔镜子宫切除术比剖腹术具有多个优势。这些优势与改善患者护理和可比较的临床结果有关。经过仔细的分析,我们认为腹腔镜检查应成为早期子宫内膜癌手术治疗的护理标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号