首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine. >Reduction and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with posterior fixation versus transsacral cage fusion in situ with posterior fixation in the treatment of Grade 2 adult isthmic spondylolisthesis in the lumbosacral spine
【24h】

Reduction and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with posterior fixation versus transsacral cage fusion in situ with posterior fixation in the treatment of Grade 2 adult isthmic spondylolisthesis in the lumbosacral spine

机译:后路椎弓根椎间融合术复位与inter骨椎间融合融合后路固定术治疗2级成人腰s部脊柱滑脱

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Object. In situ transsacral fusion in the treatment of low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis has rarely been reported. The authors treated 13 cases of L-5 Grade 2 isthmic spondylolisthesis associated with collapsed disc space and osteoporosis by using transsacral fusion and fixation, and compared its clinical and radiological outcomes with the results of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and instrumental reduction in 21 patients. Methods. The authors retrospectively analyzed 21 patients in Group A who were treated with reduction and TLIF, and 13 patients in Group B who were treated with transsacral cage fusion. Oswestry Disability Index and visual analog scale scores of back and leg pain were used to evaluate clinical outcomes. Radiological parameters for assessment included the percentage of slippage, whole lumbar lordosis, and lumbosacral angle. Operative data, fusion rate, and perioperative complications were recorded as well. Results. The mean operation time and blood loss in Group B was less than that in Group A. Both groups realized good recovery from previous symptoms. The decrease in back and leg pain after surgery was significant within each group, without much difference between the 2 groups. No significant differences were found in lumbosacral angle, whole lumbar lordosis, visual analog scale score, and Oswestry Disability Index score between the 2 groups after surgery. The solid fusion rate was 95.2% in Group A and 92.3% in Group B. In Group A, 2 patients suffered from graft site pain, 1 had a superficial infection, and 1 had screw loosening; in Group B, dural tears were found in 2 patients, transient S-1 paresthesia in 2, and extensor hallucis longus muscle weakness in 1. Conclusions. For patients with a collapsed disc space and poor bone quality, posterior in situ transsacral cage fusion may be used as an alternative to the TLIF procedure. The short-term clinical and radiological outcomes in the transsacral cage group were comparable with those in the TLIF group, although with a relatively higher neurological complication rate.
机译:目的。很少有报道原位经s骨融合治疗低度峡部峡部滑脱症。作者采用经s骨融合固定术治疗了13例L-5 2级峡部脊柱滑脱合并椎间盘间隙狭窄和骨质疏松症,并将其临床和影像学结果与经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)和器械复位的结果进行了比较,共21例。耐心。方法。作者回顾性分析了A组中的21例接受了还原和TLIF治疗的患者,B组中的13例接受了经s囊融合术治疗的患者。使用Oswestry残疾指数和背部和腿部疼痛的视觉模拟量表评分来评估临床结局。评估的放射学参数包括滑脱率,整个腰椎前凸和腰ac角。还记录了手术数据,融合率和围手术期并发症。结果。 B组的平均手术时间和失血量少于A组。两组均从以前的症状中恢复良好。在各组中,术后背部和腿部疼痛的减轻是显着的,两组之间没有太大差异。两组患者的腰s角,整个腰椎前凸,视觉模拟量表评分和Oswestry残疾指数评分之间无显着差异。 A组的实心融合率为95.2%,B组的实心融合率为92.3%。A组的2例患者发生移植部位疼痛,其中1例患者表面感染,1例螺钉松动。在B组中,有2例患者出现了硬脑膜撕裂,在2例中发现了短暂性S-1感觉异常,在1例中发现了伸指幻觉长肌无力。对于椎间盘间隙狭窄和骨骼质量较差的患者,可采用后原位经trans囊融合作为TLIF手术的替代方法。经s骨笼组的短期临床和放射学结局与TLIF组相当,但神经系统并发症的发生率相对较高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号