首页> 外文期刊>Journal of managed care pharmacy : >Evaluation of medication therapy management services for patients with cardiovascular disease in a self-insured employer health plan
【24h】

Evaluation of medication therapy management services for patients with cardiovascular disease in a self-insured employer health plan

机译:在自保雇主健康计划中评估针对心血管疾病患者的药物治疗管理服务

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major cause of mortality in the United States, representing the highest total expenditures among major diseases. To improve CVD-associated outcomes, medication therapy management (MTM) services have been included in essential health benefit packages offered by various health plans. Nevertheless, the impact of such MTM services on outcomes is still unclear, especially from the perspective of the self-insured employer. Objectives: To (a) compare economic outcomes between patients who received and those who did not receive MTM services from the self-insured employer's perspective and (b) compare clinical outcomes before and after receiving MTM services. Methods: This study consisted of 2 pre-and post-retrospective designs: (1) a cohort study with comparison groups and (2) a cohort study within group comparison. Patients were beneficiaries aged 19 years or older who were diagnosed with CVD conditions according to ICD-9-CM codes and continuously enrolled in a public university-sponsored insurance plan between 2008-2010. Patients were divided into MTM and non-MTM groups. The first MTM encounter was assigned as the index date for the MTM group. Match-paired patients who did not receive MTM services were randomly assigned the index date based on age category, gender, and comorbidity. Measures for pharmacy, medical, and total expenditures were obtained from medical and pharmacy claims. Paired t-tests and independent t-tests using data generated from 1000 bootstraps compared mean cost difference within and between groups. The return on investment (ROI) was calculated by dividing the average net benefit from MTM services by the average cost of MTM services. Clinical parameters, including blood pressure (BP) and body mass index (BMI), were retrieved from electronic medical records from a pharmacist-provided clinic where MTM services took place. Paired-t tests were used to compare the mean difference between baseline and endpoint values. Further, this study examined changes in the proportion of patients who achieved an individualized treatment goal for BP and BMI. The study also quantified the improvement in disease stages after the index date using the McNemar's test. Statistical analyses were performed by using SAS software version 9.2 with statistical significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 63 patients and 62 match-paired patients were included in the MTM group and the non-MTM group, respectively. The mean cost (SD) per patient in the MTM group during the 6 months post-index period for CVD-related pharmacy, all-cause medical, and total expenditures was lower than the 6 months pre-index period by $22.0 (19.1), $79.2 (99.6), and $75.1 (136.2), respectively. In contrast, the mean cost (SD) for the non-MTM group increased during the 6 months post-index date by $10.7 (24.2), $246.4 (248.4), and $289.0 (269.5) for pharmacy, medical, and total RESEARCH expenditure, respectively. When comparing the 2 groups, the MTM group had statistically significantly lower costs per patient for pharmacy expenditures (difference of -31.9 ± 25.1, P 0.0001), medical expenditures (difference of -$325.6 ± 271.2, P 0.0001), and total direct expenditures (difference of -$359.3 ± 219.2, P 0.0001). Given the net benefit of MTM services ($359.3) and the average cost of MTM service ($134.6), the ROI was $1.67 per $1 in MTM cost. Regarding clinical outcomes, while no statistically significant differences were observed in clinical outcomes, MTM services demonstrated clinical benefits. At the post-index period, the percentage of patients who had achieved their goals increased from 55% to 70% for BP and from 13.0% to 21.7% for normal BMI compared with the pre-index period. In terms of the extent of improvement in disease stages, clinical improvements in the stages of hypertension (χ2 =12.77, P 0.05) as well as BMI (χ2 =6.39, P 0.05) at the endpoint were observed. Conclusions: Cardiovascular
机译:背景:心血管疾病(CVD)在美国是导致死亡的主要原因,在主要疾病中占总支出最高。为了改善与CVD相关的结果,药物治疗管理(MTM)服务已包含在各种健康计划提供的基本健康福利包中。然而,这种MTM服务对结果的影响仍然不清楚,尤其是从自保雇主的角度来看。目标:(a)从自保雇主的角度比较接受和未接受MTM服务的患者之间的经济结果,以及(b)比较接受MTM服务前后的临床结果。方法:本研究包括2个回顾性研究前后的设计:(1)一项具有比较组的队列研究,以及(2)一项小组比较内的队列研究。患者为19岁或19岁以上的受益人,根据ICD-9-CM法规被诊断患有CVD,并在2008-2010年间连续参加了由大学赞助的公共保险计划。将患者分为MTM组和非MTM组。将第一次遇到MTM作为MTM组的索引日期。未接受MTM服务的配对患者根据年龄类别,性别和合并症随机分配索引日期。药学,医疗和总支出的衡量指标是从医学和药学索赔中获得的。使用从1000个引导程序生成的数据进行的配对t检验和独立t检验比较了组内和组间的平均成本差异。通过将MTM服务的平均净收益除以MTM服务的平均成本来计算投资回报率(ROI)。包括血压(BP)和体重指数(BMI)在内的临床参数是从一家进行过MTM服务的药剂师提供的诊所的电子病历中检索的。配对t检验用于比较基线和终点值之间的平均差异。此外,本研究检查了达到BP和BMI个性化治疗目标的患者比例的变化。该研究还使用McNemar's检验量化了指标日期后疾病阶段的改善。使用SAS软件9.2版进行统计分析,统计显着性水平为0.05。结果:MTM组和非MTM组分别包括63例患者和62例配对患者。心血管疾病相关药房,全因医疗和总支出指数后6个月期间,MTM组每位患者的平均费用(SD)比指数前6个月低22.0美元(19.1),分别为$ 79.2(99.6)和$ 75.1(136.2)。相比之下,非MTM组的平均费用(SD)在索引发布后的6个月内分别增加了10.7美元(24.2),246.4美元(248.4)和289.0美元(269.5)的药房,医疗和研究总费用,分别。比较两组时,MTM组的每位患者的药房费用(差异为-31.9±25.1,P <0.0001),医疗费用(差异为-$ 325.6±271.2,P <0.0001)和总直接费用在统计学上显着降低支出(差异为-$ 359.3±219.2,P <0.0001)。鉴于MTM服务的净收益(359.3美元)和MTM服务的平均成本(134.6美元),MTM成本每1美元的投资回报率为1.67美元。关于临床结局,尽管在临床结局中未观察到统计学上的显着差异,但MTM服务显示出了临床益处。在指标后阶段,与指标前阶段相比,血压达到目标的患者百分比从55%增加到70%,正常BMI从13.0%增加到21.7%。就疾病阶段改善的程度而言,在终点时观察到高血压阶段的临床改善(χ2= 12.77,P <0.05)以及BMI(χ2= 6.39,P <0.05)。结论:心血管

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号