首页> 外文期刊>Journal of managed care pharmacy : >Long-term medicaid excess payments from alleged price manipulation of generic lorazepam
【24h】

Long-term medicaid excess payments from alleged price manipulation of generic lorazepam

机译:所谓的劳拉西m价格操纵带来的长期医疗超额付款

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Cost savings from the use of generic drugs versus brandname drugs are well known. Both private and public prescription drug plans encourage the use of generic drugs through a variety of mechanisms. The magnitude of cost savings for a given generic drug is dependent on the degree to which the generic market is competitive. Should the competitive structure become compromised, higher prices and reduced cost savings may result. An alleged conspiracy between Mylan Laboratories and its active-ingredient suppliers in 1997 was associated with an increase in seller concentration in the generic lorazepam market. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) alleged that Mylan raised costs to consumers by $120 million because of price increases for generic lorazepam from March through December 1998 and for generic clorazepate from January through December 1998. In November 2002, a settlement with Mylan was approved by the FTC, and a federal district court required Mylan to pay $147 million, including $28.2 million to state agencies including Medicaid. Objectives: To (a) describe the seller concentration in the national Medicaid generic lorazepam market over a 19-year period from January 1991 through December 2009, (b) estimate the excess payments for generic lorazepam by Medicaid between 1998 and 2009, and (c) investigate potentially increased utilization and prices of 2 substitute pharmaceuticals: branded lorazepam (Ativan) and generic alprazolam (another widely used intermediate-acting benzodiazepine). Methods: Using Medicaid State Drug Utilization Data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, we calculated the 4-firm concentration ratio (CR4) and the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) for the Medicaid generic lorazepam market, along with pre-rebate reimbursement for pharmacy claims, number of claims (utilization), and average pre-rebate reimbursement per claim (average "price") for generic lorazepam, from 1991 through 2009. Medicaid's excess payments were estimated under 2 different assumptions regarding what the average generic lorazepam price would have been in the absence of the alleged conspiracy. To find counterfactual prices, the average per-claim reimbursement for lorazepam for the 4 quarters prior to the alleged conspiracy, $6.80, was inflated using (a) the quarterly change in the average per-claim reimbursement for generic alprazolam and (b) the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for all urban consumers, all goods. Potential impact of the alleged conspiracy on the branded lorazepam and generic alprazolam markets was investigated. Results: The average pre-rebate reimbursements per claim for generic lorazepam were $10.25, $23.12, and $8.48 in 1991, 1998, and 2009, respectively. For the same 3 years, CR 4 = 52.80, 76.02, and 86.74, while HHI = 905.71, 2,166.25, and 2,233.36. Medicaid's excess payments from 1998-2009 were estimated at approximately $625-$657 million. The data also suggest the possibility of small impacts on the utilization of branded lorazepam and the price of generic alprazolam.
机译:背景:众所周知,使用非专利药和商标药可以节省成本。私人和公共处方药计划都鼓励通过各种机制使用仿制药。给定仿制药节省成本的幅度取决于仿制药市场竞争的程度。如果竞争结构受到损害,则可能导致更高的价格和减少的成本节省。 Mylan Laboratories与它的活性成分供应商之间的一个所谓的阴谋于1997年与通用劳拉西m市场中卖方集中度的增加有关。联邦贸易委员会(FTC)称,由于1998年3月至1998年12月仿制劳拉西m和1998年1月至1998年12月仿制氯硝西ate的价格上涨,迈兰为消费者增加了1.2亿美元的成本。2002年11月,迈兰批准了与迈兰的和解美国联邦贸易委员会(FTC)和联邦地方法院要求Mylan支付1.47亿美元,其中包括向包括Medicaid在内的州机构支付2820万美元。目标:(a)描述从1991年1月到2009年12月这19年期间,全国Medicaid通用劳拉西market市场中的卖方集中程度;(b)估算1998年至2009年之间Medicaid支付的通用劳拉西m超额付款,以及(c )调查了两种替代药物的潜在使用率和价格上涨情况:品牌劳拉西((Ativan)和仿制药阿普唑仑(另一种广泛使用的中效苯并二氮杂卓)。方法:使用来自Medicare和Medicaid Services中心的Medicaid国家药物利用数据,我们计算了Medicaid通用劳拉西m市场的4药企集中率(CR4)和Herfindahl-Hirschman指数(HHI),以及折扣前的报销。 1991年至2009年期间的药效声明,索赔数量(利用率)和每项索赔的平均返利前补偿(平均“价格”)(对于劳拉西from而言)。医疗补助金的超额付款是根据2种不同的假设估算出来的,这些假设是关于劳拉西epa的平均价格如果没有所谓的阴谋的话。为了找到反事实的价格,使用(a)通用阿普唑仑的平均每项索赔的季度变化和(b)消费者夸大了所谓合谋之前的四个季度劳拉西m的平均每项索赔的补偿,为6.80美元。所有城市消费者,所有商品的价格指数(CPI)。调查了所谓阴谋对劳拉西m品牌和阿普唑仑通用市场的潜在影响。结果:1991年,1998年和2009年,通用劳拉西claim的平均每笔索赔回扣前补偿分别为$ 10.25,$ 23.12和$ 8.48。在相同的3年中,CR 4 = 52.80、76.02和86.74,而HHI = 905.71、2166.25和2233.36。 1998年至2009年,医疗补助金的超额付款额约为625至6.57亿美元。数据还表明,对品牌的劳拉西m的利用和仿制药阿普唑仑的价格影响较小的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号