...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of generic medicines >Andrx v Elan: The Eleventh Circuit applies its Schering-Plough v FTC decision
【24h】

Andrx v Elan: The Eleventh Circuit applies its Schering-Plough v FTC decision

机译:Andrx v Elan:第十一巡回法院采用了先灵P雅FTC判决

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc v Elan Corp, 421 F.3d 1227 (11th Cir. 2005), the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit ('the Eleventh Circuit') ruled that Andrx could not maintain an antitrust claim against Elan based solely on Elan's initiation of a patent infringement lawsuit against Andrx. The Eleventh Circuit reasoned that the lawsuit was not a 'sham litigation' and thus was protected under the Noerr-Pennington doctrine. The Eleventh Circuit, however, also found that Andrx had sufficiently pleaded a basis for an antitrust claim under the Sherman Act based on Elan's settlement and licensing agreement with another pharmaceutical company, SkyePharma.
机译:在Andrx Pharmaceuticals,Inc诉Elan Corp案,421 F.3d 1227(11th Cir。2005)中,美国第十一巡回上诉法院('The Eleventh Circuit')裁定Andrx无法维持仅基于Elan的反托拉斯诉讼。关于Elan对Andrx提起的专利侵权诉讼。第十一巡回法院认为该诉讼不是“伪造诉讼”,因此受到Noerr-Pennington原则的保护。然而,第十一巡回法院还发现,安德鲁根据埃兰与另一家制药公司SkyePharma达成的和解和许可协议,根据《谢尔曼法》充分提出了反托拉斯索赔的依据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号