...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical gastroenterology >Covered self-expanding metal stents may be preferable to plastic stents in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis-related biliary strictures: A systematic review comparing 2 methods of stent therapy in benign biliary strictures
【24h】

Covered self-expanding metal stents may be preferable to plastic stents in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis-related biliary strictures: A systematic review comparing 2 methods of stent therapy in benign biliary strictures

机译:在治疗慢性胰腺炎相关的胆道狭窄中,覆膜自膨胀金属支架可能优于塑料支架:比较两种系统治疗良性胆道狭窄的系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND:: Covered self-expanding metal stents (CSEMS) are being increasingly used in the endoscopic treatment of benign biliary strictures (BBS). There is no solid evidence yet to support their routine use. GOALS:: To evaluate feasibility, success rate, and complications of CSEMS compared with multiple plastic stents (PS) in BBS in a systematic review. STUDY:: A systematic search of electronic databases (Medline, Scopus, and Embase) for studies published from 2000 to 2012 combined to hand-search of reference lists resulted 4977 articles. Out of 99 potentially relevant studies selected for full-text review, 12 CSEMS (376 patients) and 13 PS studies (570 patients) met the final inclusion criteria. A systematic review comparing the 2 methods was made using proportion meta-analysis. RESULTS:: A tendency to successful use of CSEMS in strictures related to chronic pancreatitis (CP) was shown: clinical success of 77% and 33% [95% confidence interval (CI), 61%-94% vs. 4%-63%, P=0.06] was achieved with CSEMS and PS at 12 months follow-up, respectively. There were no differences in the success rates of other etiologies except CP or in the early complications. In CSEMS, incidence of late adverse events was lower in CP-related strictures (3% vs. 67%, 95% CI, 0%-13% vs. 17%-99%, P=0.02). The median number of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies was lower with CSEMSs: 1.5 versus 3.9 (P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS:: Improved clinical success with fewer endoscopic sessions and corresponding complication rate may be achieved with CSEMS treatment compared with PS in BBS secondary to CP. In other BBS etiologies, this systematic review remains inconclusive.
机译:背景:覆盖式自扩张金属支架(CSEMS)越来越多地用于内镜治疗良性胆管狭窄(BBS)。尚无确凿证据支持其常规使用。目标:在系统评价中,与多个塑料支架(PS)相比,评估CSEMS的可行性,成功率和并发症。研究::系统搜索电子数据库(Medline,Scopus和Embase),以获得2000年至2012年发表的研究结果,并人工搜索参考文献列表,共检索到4977条文章。在99篇可能相关的研究中进行了全文审查,其中12篇CSEMS(376例患者)和13篇PS研究(570例患者)符合最终纳入标准。使用比例荟萃分析系统比较了两种方法。结果:在与慢性胰腺炎(CP)相关的狭窄中成功使用CSEMS的趋势已显示:临床成功率为77%和33%[95%置信区间(CI),分别为61%-94%和4%-63 %,P = 0.06]分别在12个月的随访中达到了CSEMS和PS。除CP或早期并发症外,其他病因的成功率没有差异。在CSEMS中,CP相关狭窄的晚期不良事件发生率较低(3%比67%,95%CI,0%-13%比17%-99%,P = 0.02)。 CSEMSs的内镜逆行胰胆管造影术中位数较低:1.5比3.9(P = 0.002)。结论:与继发于CP的BBS中的PS相比,CSEMS治疗可以实现更少的内窥镜疗程和相应的并发症发生率,从而提高临床成功率。在其他BBS病因中,这种系统的评价尚无定论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号