...
首页> 外文期刊>Circulation: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association >Five-year clinical and angiographic outcomes of a randomized comparison of sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents: results of the Sirolimus-Eluting Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization LATE trial.
【24h】

Five-year clinical and angiographic outcomes of a randomized comparison of sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents: results of the Sirolimus-Eluting Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization LATE trial.

机译:西罗莫司洗脱支架与紫杉醇洗脱支架的随机比较的五年临床和血管造影结果:西罗莫司洗脱与紫杉醇洗脱支架在冠状动脉血运重建后期试验中的结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Long-term comparative data of first-generation drug-eluting stents are scarce. We investigated clinical and angiographic outcomes of sirolimus-eluting (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) at 5 years as part of the Sirolimus-Eluting Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization (SIRTAX) LATE study. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 1012 patients were randomly assigned to SES or PES. Repeat angiography was completed in 444 of 1012 patients (43.8%) at 5 years. Major adverse cardiac events occurred in 19.7% of SES- and 21.4% of PES-treated patients (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.68 to 1.17; P=0.39) at 5 years. There were no differences between SES and PES in terms of cardiac death (5.8% versus 5.7%; P=0.35), myocardial infarction (6.6% versus 6.9%; P=0.51), and target lesion revascularization (13.1% versus 15.1%; P=0.29). Between 1 and 5 years, the annual rate of target lesion revascularization was 2.0% (95% confidence interval, 1.4% to 2.6%) for SES and 1.4% (95% confidence interval, 0.9% to 2.0%) for PES. Among patients undergoing paired angiography at 8 months and 5 years, delayed lumen loss amounted to 0.37 +/- 0.73 mm for SES and 0.29 +/- 0.59 mm for PES (P=0.32). The overall rate of definite stent thrombosis was 4.6% for SES and 4.1% for PES (P=0.74), and very late definite stent thrombosis occurred at an annual rate of 0.65% (95% confidence interval, 0.40% to 0.90%). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow-up of first-generation drug-eluting stents shows no significant differences in clinical and angiographic outcomes between SES and PES. The continuous increase in late lumen loss in conjunction with the ongoing risk of very late stent thrombosis suggests that vascular healing remains incomplete up to 5 years after implantation of first-generation drug-eluting stents.
机译:背景:第一代药物洗脱支架的长期比较数据很少。我们在5年时研究了西罗莫司洗脱(SES)和紫杉醇洗脱支架(PES)的临床和血管造影结果,作为西罗莫司洗脱与紫杉醇洗脱支架进行冠脉血运重建(SIRTAX)LATE研究的一部分。方法与结果:总共1012例患者被随机分配至SES或PES。 5年内1012名患者中的444名(43.8%)完成了重复血管造影。 5年时,SES-治疗的患者中有19.7%发生了严重的心脏不良事件,PES治疗的患者中发生了21.4%的严重心脏事件(危险比,0.89; 95%可信区间,0.68至1.17; P = 0.39)。 SES和PES在心源性死亡(5.8%vs. 5.7%; P = 0.35),心肌梗塞(6.6%vs 6.9%; P = 0.51)和目标病变血运重建(13.1%vs 15.1%)之间没有差异。 P = 0.29)。在1至5年之间,SES的目标病变血运重建年率分别为2.0%(95%置信区间,1.4%至2.6%)和PES为1.4%(95%置信区间,0.9%至2.0%)。在8个月和5年时进行配对血管造影的患者中,SES的延迟管腔丢失总计为0.37 +/- 0.73 mm,PES的延迟管腔丢失总计为0.29 +/- 0.59 mm(P = 0.32)。 SES和PES的明确支架血栓形成总体发生率为4.6%(P = 0.74),非常晚期的明确支架血栓形成发生率为0.65%(95%置信区间,0.40%至0.90%)。结论:对第一代药物洗脱支架的长期随访显示,SES和PES在临床和血管造影结果方面无显着差异。晚期管腔丢失的持续增加以及支架晚期血栓形成的持续风险提示,在植入第一代药物洗脱支架后的5年内,血管愈合仍不完全。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号