首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Archaeological Science >An assessment of morphological criteria for discriminating sheep and goat mandibles on a large prehistoric archaeological assemblage (Kerma, Sudan)
【24h】

An assessment of morphological criteria for discriminating sheep and goat mandibles on a large prehistoric archaeological assemblage (Kerma, Sudan)

机译:评估大型史前考古组合上的绵羊和山羊下颌骨的形态学标准(苏丹,科尔马)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper presents an assessment of all known dental and mandibular morphological criteria for differentiating sheep (Ovis aries) and goats (Capra hircus) using for the first time an archaeological sample of complete caprine skeletons (90 sheep and 13 goats) from burials at Kerma (Sudan, 3rd and 2nd millennia BC). The species determinations were assessed using cranial and post-cranial morphological criteria. Consequently, the reliability (percentage of correct determination) and efficiency (complementary percentage of intermediate scores i.e. neither sheep nor goat) of 38 individual dental criteria could be fully assessed using a prehistoric homogeneous domesticate population. We demonstrate that, for this sample, individual criteria for lacteal teeth are more reliable for sheep (sheep: 95 ±3%) than the adult premolars (85 ± 5%) and molars (sheep: 88 ± 2%), whereas for goats premolar criteria were more reliable (83 ±12%). For efficiency, lacteal dental criteria are better (goat: 97 ±5%; sheep: 95 ±3%) than those for premolar (goat: 85 ±10%; sheep: 79 ±5%) and molar (goat: 82 6%; sheep: 83 ±2). We also demonstrated that most isolated teeth can be determined with less than 10% error. However, on average, within specific age classes (0e1 year, 1e4 years and more than 4 years), isolated teeth increased in reliability and decreased in efficiency. The average reliability of the criteria for complete mandibles for each age class for goats and sheep was 100%, when the efficiency was 67, 40 and 50% for goats and over 90% for sheep. This is due to the effect of age on the efficiency of isolated criteria and the poor performance of specific criteria mainly those P3, M1 and M2.We conclude that separate species kill-off profiles are possible. The effect of age on dental criteria would not significantly change the interpretation for specific subsistence strategies focused on one particularly species.
机译:本文首次评估了所有已知的牙齿和下颌形态学标准,以区分绵羊(Ovis aries)和山羊(Capra hircus),这是首次使用来自喀尔马(Kerma)墓葬的完整山羊骨架(90只绵羊和13只山羊)的考古样本苏丹,公元前3和2世纪。使用颅骨和颅后形态学标准评估物种的确定。因此,可以使用史前史上同质的家养人口来全面评估38个个体牙科标准的可靠性(正确确定的百分比)和效率(中间评分的互补百分比,即既不是绵羊也不是山羊)。我们证明,对于该样本,绵羊(绵羊:95±3%)的乳齿的标准比成年前磨牙(85±5%)和磨牙(绵羊:88±2%)的乳齿更可靠,而山羊前磨牙标准更为可靠(83±12%)。为了提高效率,与前磨牙(山羊:85±10%;绵羊:79±5%)和磨牙(山羊:82 6%)相比,乳牙牙科标准更好(山羊:97±5%;绵羊:95±3%) ;绵羊:83±2)。我们还证明,大多数孤立的牙齿可以确定的误差小于10%。但是,平均而言,在特定年龄段(0e1年,1e4年和4年以上)中,离体牙齿的可靠性增加,效率降低。对于山羊和绵羊,每个年龄段的完整下颌骨标准的平均可靠性为100%,而山羊的效率为67%,40%和50%,绵羊的效率为90%以上。这是由于年龄对孤立标准效率的影响以及特定标准主要是P3,M1和M2的性能不佳所致。年龄对牙齿标准的影响不会显着改变针对一种特定物种的特定生存策略的解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号