首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Archaeological Science >An experimental study of large mammal bone modification by crocodiles and its bearing on the interpretation of crocodile predation at FLK Zinj and FLK NN3
【24h】

An experimental study of large mammal bone modification by crocodiles and its bearing on the interpretation of crocodile predation at FLK Zinj and FLK NN3

机译:鳄鱼对大型哺乳动物骨骼进行修饰的实验研究及其对FLK Zinj和FLK NN3鳄鱼捕食的解释

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The taphonomic signature of crocodiles as agents of bone modification has been previously identified by specific tooth mark types (e.g., bisected pits) and by a conspicuous presence of these marks: more than 75% of bones modified by crocodiles bear at least one of these distinctive marks. Therefore, crocodile tooth-marking would be notably prevalent in bone assemblages resulting from crocodile predation and active scavenging. The present study contributes to refine this diagnosis by showing greater variability of these types of marks, a different degree of tooth-marking intensity, and a somewhat different distri-bution of tooth-marked elements according to skeletal parts from previous experiments with crocodiles. Some of these differences are due to different experimental variables and conditions and this highlights the need to understand behavioral variability in crocodile ecological settings. This variability in crocodile tooth-marking probably results from several as-yet-inadequately measured behavioral and ecological factors, such as intensity of feeding competition and differences between male and female crocodile feeding behaviors, among others. Furthermore, this study also contributes to a better definition of the microscopic criteria that can be used to distinguish crocodile-inflicted marks from other types of bone surface modifications. In light of these and previous experimental frameworks, we reevaluate the application of these analogs to modifications documented in hominin fossils from Olduvai Gorge (OH8 and OH35) and the resulting inferences about the hazard posed by crocodiles on the paleolandscape where FLK North North and FLK Zinj (Bed I) were formed. The taphonomic analysis also shows that Olduvai OH8 and OH35 were probably not preyed upon by crocodiles. It is concluded that no tangible evidence can be used to support the interpretation that OH35 was modified by crocodiles and that the overall presence of crocodiles in FLK North North and FLK Zinj was rather marginal, based on the virtual absence of crocodile-modified bones in both archaeofaunal assemblages.
机译:先前通过特定的牙齿标记类型(例如,二等分的凹痕)和这些标记的显着存在来识别出鳄鱼作为骨骼修饰剂的分子标记:超过75%的被鳄鱼修饰的骨头带有至少其中一种分数。因此,鳄鱼牙齿标记在鳄鱼捕食和主动清除产生的骨骼组合中尤为普遍。本研究通过显示这些标记类型的更大变异性,不同程度的牙齿标记强度以及根据之前与鳄鱼进行的实验的骨骼部位显示的牙齿标记元素的分布有所不同,为完善诊断做出了贡献。其中一些差异是由于不同的实验变量和条件引起的,这突出了需要了解鳄鱼生态环境中的行为变异性的需要。鳄鱼牙齿标记的这种变化可能是由于尚未充分测量的一些行为和生态因素造成的,例如摄食竞争的激烈程度以及雄性和雌性鳄鱼摄食行为之间的差异等。此外,这项研究还有助于更好地定义微观标准,该标准可用于区分鳄鱼造成的痕迹与其他类型的骨表面修饰。根据这些和先前的实验框架,我们重新评估这些类似物在Olduvai Gorge人源化石(OH8和OH35)中记载的修饰中的应用,以及由此推断出鳄鱼对北佛罗里达州FLK Zinj和古地形的危害。 (床一)成立。拓朴分析还表明,Olduvai OH8和OH35可能不会被鳄鱼捕食。结论是,没有明显的证据可支持对OH35被鳄鱼进行修饰的解释,并且基于两者中实际上都没有鳄鱼修饰的骨骼,FLK North North和FLK Zinj中鳄鱼的整体存在是相当微不足道的。古植物群。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号