...
首页> 外文期刊>JAMA psychiatry >Mapping Common Psychiatric Disorders Structure and Predictive Validity in the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions
【24h】

Mapping Common Psychiatric Disorders Structure and Predictive Validity in the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions

机译:全国酒精和相关疾病流行病学调查中常见精神疾病结构的映射和预测效度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Context: Clinical experience and factor analytic studies suggest that some psychiatric disorders may be more closely related to one another, as indicated by the frequency of their co-occurrence, which may have etiologic and treatment implications. Objective: To construct a virtual space of common psychiatric disorders, spanned by factors reflecting major psy-chopathologic dimensions, and locate psychiatric disorders in that space, as well as to examine whether the location of disorders at baseline predicts the prevalence and incidence of disorders at 3-year follow-up. Design, Setting, and Patients: A total of 34 653 individuals participated in waves 1 and 2 of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Main Outcome Measures: The distance between disorders at wave 1, calculated using the loadings of the factors spanning the space of disorders as coordinates. This distance was correlated with the adjusted odds ratios for age, sex, and race/ethnicity of the prevalence and incidence of Axis I disorders in wave 2, with the aim of determining whether smaller distances between disorders at wave 1 predicts higher disorder prevalence and incidence at wave 2. Results: A model with 3 correlated factors provided an excellent fit (Comparative Fit Index=0.99, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.98, root mean square error of approximation =0.008) for the structure of common psychiatric disorders and was used to span the space of disorders. Distances ranged from 0.070 (between drug abuse and dysthymia) to 1.032 (between drug abuse and avoidant personality disorder). The correlation of distance between disorders in wave 1 with adjusted odds ratios of prevalence in wave 2 was -0.56. The correlation of distance in wave 1 with adjusted odds ratios of incidence in wave 2 was -0.57. Conclusions: Mapping psychiatric disorders can be used to quantify the distances among disorders. Proximity in turn can be used to predict prospectively the incidence and prevalence of Axis I disorders.
机译:背景:临床经验和因素分析研究表明,某些精神病可能彼此之间存在更密切的联系,这是由其共同发生的频率所表明的,这可能对病因和治疗产生影响。目的:通过反映主要精神病理学因素的因素,构建一个常见精神病性疾病的虚拟空间,并在该空间中定位精神病性疾病,并检查疾病在基线的位置是否可以预测该病的患病率和发生率三年随访。设计,环境和患者:共有34 653个人参加了《全国酒精及相关疾病流行病学调查》的第一波和第二波。主要结果测量:在第1浪时疾病之间的距离,使用跨越疾病空间的因子负荷作为坐标来计算。该距离与第2浪中轴I障碍患病率和发病率的年龄,性别和种族/种族的调整比值比相关,目的是确定第1浪中疾病之间的较小距离是否预示着更高的患病率和发病率在第2波时。结果:具有3个相关因子的模型为常见的精神疾病的结构提供了出色的拟合度(比较拟合指数= 0.99,Tucker-Lewis指数= 0.98,均方根近似值= 0.008),并用于跨越疾病的空间。距离范围从0.070(在药物滥用和心境障碍之间)到1.032(在药物滥用和回避型人格障碍之间)。波动1中疾病失调之间的距离与波动2中患病率调整后的相关性为-0.56。波1中的距离与波2中入射的已调整比值比的相关性是-0.57。结论:映射精神疾病可以用来量化疾病之间的距离。邻近度又可以用来预测I轴疾病的发生率和患病率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号