首页> 外文期刊>Toxicon: An International Journal Devoted to the Exchange of Knowledge on the Poisons Derived from Animals, Plants and Microorganisms >A comparison of the mouse bioassay with liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry for the detection of lipophilic toxins in shellfish from Scottish waters
【24h】

A comparison of the mouse bioassay with liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry for the detection of lipophilic toxins in shellfish from Scottish waters

机译:液相色谱-质谱法小鼠生物测定与苏格兰水域贝类中亲脂性毒素检测的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Some lipophilic shellfish toxins (LSTs) can cause human illness due to eating shellfish that have become naturally contaminated following filter feeding on toxin producing algae. A mouse bioassay (MBA) is widely used to detect LSTs in regulatory monitoring of shellfish. However, the MBA is imprecise giving only a positive or negative result and is prone to interference from other compounds. In this study, liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) was compared to the MBA, with the aim of substituting the in vivo assay for monitoring shellfish from Scottish waters. Overall, it was not feasible to demonstrate equivalence of LC–MS with the MBA, but due to the detection of a range of LSTs, it is considered that LC–MS methods capable of detecting multiple analogues are accepted by international markets of shellfish to assure consumer protection.
机译:某些亲脂性贝类毒素(LSTs)可能会因食用贝类而引起人类疾病,因为贝类在滤过毒素产生的藻类为食后已受到自然污染。小鼠生物测定法(MBA)被广泛用于检测贝类监管监视中的LST。但是,MBA并不精确,只能给出正面或负面的结果,并且容易受到其他化合物的干扰。在这项研究中,液相色谱-质谱法(LC-MS)与MBA进行了比较,目的是替代体内分析法来监测苏格兰水域的贝类。总的来说,要证明LC-MS与MBA的等效性是不可行的,但是由于检测到了一系列LST,因此认为能够检测多种类似物的LC-MS方法已被国际贝类市场所接受,以确保消费者保护。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号