【24h】

Needle thoracostomy conclusions.

机译:针头胸腔造瘘的结论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I read with interest the needle thoracos-tomy cadaver study and the accompanying editorial comments. In their study, the authors demonstrated a 100% success rate of reaching the pleura (and presumably a tension pneumothorax, if present) in 20 predominantly male cadavers of unknown age and weight and found a higher success rate with a 5 cm needle in a midaxillary site compared with the traditional midclavicular site. The editorial view was that this study "conclusively" demonstrated that the midaxillary site is the "safer and easier" site and that ATLS guidelines should be modified accordingly. If "safer and easier"was intended to refer to success (because no data were presented specifically regarding safety or ease), then it should be noted that success in their study design may not translate to success in the field due to differences in the body habitus of cadavers compared with trauma victims that the authors themselves mentioned as limitations.
机译:我感兴趣地阅读了针状胸腔切开尸体的研究以及随附的社论评论。在他们的研究中,作者证明了在20名年龄和体重不明的主要男性尸体中达到胸膜的成功率(如果有的话可能还有张力气胸),其成功率为100%,并且发现在中腋毛处使用5 cm针的成功率更高与传统的锁骨中段相比。社论认为,这项研究“结论性地”证明了中腋位是“更安全,更容易”的位点,应相应地修改ATLS指南。如果“更安全,更容易”是指成功(因为没有专门介绍安全性或便利性的数据),则应注意的是,由于身体差异,研究设计的成功可能不会转化为成功作者自己提到的尸体习惯与创伤受害者相比是局限性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号