首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of arthroplasty >Comparing the effects of single shot sciatic nerve block versus posterior capsule local anesthetic infiltration on analgesia and functional outcome after total knee arthroplasty a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial
【24h】

Comparing the effects of single shot sciatic nerve block versus posterior capsule local anesthetic infiltration on analgesia and functional outcome after total knee arthroplasty a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial

机译:比较单次坐骨神经阻滞与后囊局部麻醉药浸润对全膝关节置换术后镇痛和功能结局的影响,一项前瞻性,随机,双盲,对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Peripheral nerve blocks appear to provide effective analgesia for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Although the literature supports the use of femoral nerve block, addition of sciatic nerve block is controversial. In this study we investigated the value of sciatic nerve block and an alternative technique of posterior capsule local anesthetic infiltration analgesia. 100 patients were prospectively randomized into three groups. Group 1: sciatic nerve block; Group 2: posterior local anesthetic infiltration; Group 3: control. All patients received a femoral nerve block and spinal anesthesia. There were no differences in pain scores between groups. Sciatic nerve block provided a brief clinically insignificant opioid sparing effect. We conclude that sciatic nerve block and posterior local anesthetic infiltration do not provide significant analgesic benefits.
机译:周围神经阻滞似乎为接受全膝关节置换术的患者提供有效的镇痛作用。尽管文献支持股神经阻滞的使用,但坐骨神经阻滞的增加仍存在争议。在这项研究中,我们调查了坐骨神经阻滞的价值和后囊局部麻醉药浸润镇痛的替代技术。前瞻性将100例患者随机分为三组。第一组:坐骨神经阻滞;第2组:后部局部麻醉药浸润;第三组:控制。所有患者均接受了股神经阻滞和脊髓麻醉。两组之间的疼痛评分没有差异。坐骨神经阻滞提供了短暂的临床意义上微不足道的阿片样物质保留作用。我们得出结论,坐骨神经阻滞和后麻醉药浸润不能提供明显的镇痛作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号