【24h】

Charging for the use of plant varieties

机译:使用植物变种收费

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Private and many publicly funded plant breeding organisations charge farmers for use of varieties they develop. This article compares four alternative charging mechanisms and outlines responses to these alternatives by farmers and plant breeders. Risk-averse farmers and breeders are shown to have opposite preferences for charging mechanisms. Results suggest profit-based or ad valorem royalties are preferred by farmers whereas breeders prefer area or tonnage-based royalties. Risk-sharing arrangements between both parties could lead to an overall preference for profit-based or ad valorem royalties. However, this finding is subject to important caveats and practical limitations.
机译:私人和许多公共资助的植物育种组织向农民收取他们开发的品种的使用费。本文比较了四种替代收费机制,并概述了农民和植物育种者对这些替代收费的反应。规避风险的农民和育种者对收费机制的偏好相反。结果表明,农民更喜欢以利润为基础或从价的特许权使用费,而育种者则以面积或吨位为基础的特许权使用费。双方之间的风险分担安排可能导致整体上偏爱基于利润的或从价使用费。但是,此发现受到重要的警告和实际限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号