...
【24h】

ANALYTICAL BIAS - THE NEGLECTED COMPONENT OF MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY

机译:分析偏差-测量不确定度的被忽略部分

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

All analysts ale accustomed to reporting measurement results accompanied by either the standard deviation of individual results from the mean or the standard error of the mean, These statements indicate repeatability of measurement under unchanged conditions, or reproducibility, where the time period over which measurements are taken is the source of changed conditions, Repeatability generally produces a smaller deviation between replicates than does reproducibility, However, most of the variability of measurements made by different laboratories, or using different methods in a single laboratory, is not accounted for by either repeatability or reproducibility attributable to time period, This is evident in all interlaboratory data sets; these frequently contain between-laboratory and between-method discrepancies that are very large in comparison with the uncertainty of measurements typically reported by individual laboratories. Recently issued ISO guidelines and related documents address these discrepancies as a legitimate component of measurement uncertainty, and recommend expanding the concept to include the deviation of a measurement from the true value of the measurand, so long as this deviation is small relative to fitness for purpose requirements, When the bias of measurement renders the result unsuitable for purpose, however, that bias is a significant effect and must be removed by use of a correction factor, To correct for significant bias, or to include smaller bias as an uncertainty component, laboratories must evaluate and quantify the bias in their measurements to the fullest extent possible, This paper presents uncertainty statements developed in accordance with the ISO guidelines for several reference sample measurements, Some are very complex, drawn from published work Of metrology laboratories, Others, drawn from the author's data for the Japanese Sedimentary rock reference materials, are more suitable for routine laboratory use. [References: 20]
机译:所有分析师都习惯于报告测量结果,并附有单个结果与平均值的平均值偏差或平均值的标准误差。这些陈述表示在不变条件下测量的可重复性,或在进行测量的时间段内的可重复性是变化条件的来源,通常重复性之间的可重复性比可重复性产生的偏差小,但是,不同实验室或在单个实验室中使用不同方法进行的测量的大多数变异性不能由可重复性或可重复性来解释归因于时间段,这在所有实验室间数据集中都很明显;这些经常包含实验室间和方法间的差异,与各个实验室通常报告的测量不确定度相比,差异非常大。最新发布的ISO准则和相关文档将这些差异作为测量不确定度的合法组成部分,并建议将概念扩展到包括测量值与被测量者真实值的偏差,只要该偏差相对于目的适用性较小要求,但是,当测量偏差导致结果不适合于目的时,该偏差会产生重大影响,必须通过使用校正因子将其消除。要校正明显偏差,或将较小偏差作为不确定性组成部分,实验室必须尽可能最大程度地评估和量化其测量中的偏差,本文介绍了根据ISO准则针对几种参考样品测量制定的不确定性陈述,其中一些非常复杂,摘自计量实验室的工作,其他则摘自作者的数据为日本沉积岩参考资料,更多适合常规实验室使用。 [参考:20]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号