...
首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Prospective comparative study of endoscopic management of bladder lithiasis: is prostate surgery a necessary adjunct?
【24h】

Prospective comparative study of endoscopic management of bladder lithiasis: is prostate surgery a necessary adjunct?

机译:内镜治疗膀胱结石的前瞻性比较研究:前列腺手术是否是必要的辅助手段?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To present the results of a prospective study comparing transurethral cystolithotripsy and simultaneous transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), with transurethral cystolithotripsy and medical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. The traditional dogma that bladder lithiasis constitutes an absolute indication for prostatic surgery has recently been questioned. METHODS: A total of 64 patients with bladder calculi were included in the present study. In all patients, stone clearance was achieved transurethrally. The patients in group 1 (n=32) underwent TURP during the same session, and the patients in group 2 (n=32) underwent medical therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia (tamsulosin plus finasteride). RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 28.23+/-8.84 months. No statistically significant differences were found between the 2 groups regarding the preoperative parameters (age, International Prostate Symptom Score, prostatic volume, peak urinary flow rate, postvoid residual urine volume, prostate-specific antigen level, and bladder stone characteristics). Both groups experienced statistically significant postoperative improvements in the International Prostate Symptom Score, peak urinary flow rate, and postvoid residual urine volume. However, patients in group 1 experienced a more pronounced improvement in the International Prostate Symptom Score (P=.02) and peak urinary flow rate (P=.001). In total, 11 patients in group 2 underwent TURP during follow-up, with medical management considered to have failed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed the postvoid residual urine volume as an independent risk factor that predicted the need for TURP in group 2 patients (odds ratio 1.033, 95% CI for odds ratio 1.007-1.060, P=.014). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the present study have provided useful information on the natural history of bladder lithiasis, particularly in the context of improved patient consultation.
机译:目的:提出一项前瞻性研究的结果,比较经尿道膀胱胆囊碎石术和同时经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)与经尿道膀胱胆囊碎石术和良性前列腺增生的药物治疗。最近有人质疑膀胱结石症是前列腺手术的绝对指征的传统教条。方法:本研究共纳入64例膀胱结石患者。在所有患者中,经尿道清除结石。第1组(n = 32)的患者在同一疗程中接受了TURP,第2组(n = 32)的患者因良性前列腺增生(坦索罗辛加非那雄胺)接受了药物治疗。结果:平均随访时间为28.23 +/- 8.84个月。两组之间在术前参数(年龄,国际前列腺症状评分,前列腺体积,尿峰值流速,无尿后残留尿量,前列腺特异性抗原水平和膀胱结石特征)方面没有统计学上的显着差异。两组术后的国际前列腺症状评分,峰值尿流率和术后无残留尿量均在统计学上有显着改善。但是,第1组患者的国际前列腺症状评分(P = .02)和最大尿流率(P = .001)有了更明显的改善。总共2组中的11例患者在随访期间接受了TURP,医疗管理被认为失败了。多元逻辑回归分析显示,空腹残留尿量是预测2组患者需要TURP的独立危险因素(几率1.033,95%CI,几率1.007-1.060,P = .014)。结论:本研究的发现为膀胱结石的自然病史提供了有用的信息,特别是在改善患者咨询的情况下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号