...
首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Editorial comment.
【24h】

Editorial comment.

机译:编辑评论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

These authors surveyed laparoscopic nephrectomy training from the viewpoints of both residents and attending physicians. Although surveys have obvious limitations, this study attempts to answer a vitally important question. It is not surprising that disagreement exists between the perceptions of residents and attending physicians with regard to laparoscopic nephrectomy training. I could not imagine it any other way. Training in port closure and hilar dissection showed the most consistency, die former because attending physicians probably uniformly concede this part of the procedure, and the latter because it is easy to remember who actually dissects the renal hilum
机译:这些作者从住院医师和主治医生的角度对腹腔镜肾切除术的培训进行了调查。尽管调查有明显的局限性,但本研究试图回答一个至关重要的问题。因此,就腹腔镜肾切除术培训而言,居民与主治医师之间存在分歧是不足为奇的。我无法想象其他任何方式。闭孔和肺门解剖的培训显示出最大的一致性,前者之所以死是因为主治医生可能一致承认这一过程,后者是因为很容易记住谁真正解剖了肾门

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号