...
首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Comparison of novel tissue apposing device and standard anastomotic technique for vesicourethral anastomoses.
【24h】

Comparison of novel tissue apposing device and standard anastomotic technique for vesicourethral anastomoses.

机译:膀胱尿道吻合术的新型组织放置装置与标准吻合技术的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a novel sutureless tissue apposing vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA) device in a porcine model and compare it with standard laparoscopically sutured VUA. METHODS: Thirty domestic pigs were divided into six groups. In groups 1, 2, and 3, a standard laparoscopic sutured running VUA was performed. In groups 4, 5, and 6, a novel device VUA was performed. In all cases, cystography was completed immediately after completion of the anastomosis and when each pig was killed. At necropsy, the gross findings of the VUA were documented, and each anastomosis was excised en bloc for histopathologic evaluation of healing parameters. RESULTS: In the 30 pigs, 29 (97%) device or sutured VUAs were successfully performed laparoscopically without conversion to an open approach. The mean operative time for the standard and device groups was 87 and 68 minutes, respectively (P = 0.04). The anastomotic time for the standard and device groups was 41 and 12 minutes, respectively (P <0.01). Histopathologic evaluation of the groups at 1 week of follow-up revealed significantly lower fibrosis scores for the novel anastomosis device VUA compared with the standard sutured VUA (median score 1 and 3, respectively; P = 0.04). The evaluation of groups 2 and 5 (3-week survival) and groups 3 and 6 (7-week survival) revealed no significant differences in any of the histopathologic parameters evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: The novel device requires little technical skill to deploy and is expeditious, requiring less time than a standard sutured anastomosis. At the 1 week follow-up point, histopathologic examination revealed that the novel device was superior regarding fibrotic reactions.
机译:目的:在猪模型中评估一种新型的无缝线组织膀胱尿道吻合术(VUA)装置,并将其与标准腹腔镜缝合VUA进行比较。方法:将30头家猪分为六组。在第1、2和3组中,执行标准的腹腔镜缝合运行的VAA。在第4、5和6组中,执行了一种新颖的设备VUA。在所有情况下,在完成吻合术后以及每头猪被杀死后立即进行膀胱造影。尸检时,记录了VUA的总体检查结果,并整体切除了每个吻合术,以对愈合参数进行组织病理学评估。结果:30头猪中,有29例(97%)装置或缝合的VUA成功地通过腹腔镜进行了手术,而未转换为开放式方法。标准组和设备组的平均手术时间分别为87分钟和68分钟(P = 0.04)。标准组和器械组的吻合时间分别为41分钟和12分钟(P <0.01)。随访1周时对各组的组织病理学评估显示,与标准缝合VUA相比,新型吻合装置VUA的纤维化评分明显较低(分别为中值1和3; P = 0.04)。第2组和第5组(3周生存期)和第3组和第6组(7周生存期)的评估显示,所评估的任何组织病理学参数均无显着差异。结论:该新型​​装置需要很少的技术技能来部署并且迅速,与标准的缝合吻合术相比需要更少的时间。在1周的随访时间,组织病理学检查显示,该新型装置在纤维化反应方面具有优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号