...
首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Anatomic basis for lymph node counts as measure of lymph node dissection extent: A cadaveric study
【24h】

Anatomic basis for lymph node counts as measure of lymph node dissection extent: A cadaveric study

机译:淋巴结计数的解剖基础作为淋巴结清扫范围的量度:尸体研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To determine the number, variability, and distribution of pelvic lymph nodes to better understand the utility of the node count as a surrogate for the dissection extent. Although pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) at radical cystectomy for bladder cancer is critical for disease control and staging, debate regarding the measurement of dissection adequacy remains. Many have proposed minimum node counts, yet an anatomic study assessing the number and variability of lymph nodes in the PLND templates is lacking. Materials and Methods: Super-extended PLND was performed on 26 human cadavers, and the lymph nodes within each of 12 dissection zones were enumerated by a single pathologist. We calculated the mean, standard deviation, and range of nodal yield within each dissection region. The super-extended and standard dissection templates were compared using the paired t test. Results: Super-extended PLND yielded a mean of 28.5 ?? 11.5 lymph nodes, with a total node count range of 10-53 nodes. In contrast, the nodal yield within the standard template was 18.3 ?? 6.3 nodes, with a range of 8-28 nodes (P <.001). No significant differences were seen in lymph node counts when stratified by age, sex, or cause of death. Conclusion: Using a cadaveric model and a single pathologist to eliminate many of the factors affecting the nodal yield in surgical series, we found substantial interindividual differences, with counts ranging from 10 to 53 nodes. These results have demonstrated the limited utility of lymph node count as a surrogate for the dissection extent and illustrated the challenges associated with implementing a surgical standard for minimum lymph node counts. ? 2013 Elsevier Inc.
机译:目的:确定盆腔淋巴结的数量,变异性和分布,以更好地了解淋巴结清扫作为替代解剖范围的效用。尽管在膀胱癌根治性膀胱切除术中进行盆腔淋巴结清扫术(PLND)对于疾病控制和分期至关重要,但有关清扫术是否足够的测量仍有争议。许多人提出了最少的淋巴结计数,但尚缺乏评估PLND模板中淋巴结的数目和变异性的解剖学研究。材料和方法:对26名人体尸体进行超扩展PLND,并由一名病理学家枚举12个解剖区域中每个区域的淋巴结。我们计算了每个解剖区域内的平均值,标准差和节点屈服范围。使用配对t检验比较超扩展和标准解剖模板。结果:超扩展PLND的平均值为28.5? 11.5个淋巴结,总淋巴结范围为10-53个淋巴结。相反,标准模板内的节点屈服值为18.3 ??。 6.3个节点,范围为8-28个节点(P <.001)。按年龄,性别或死亡原因分层时,淋巴结计数无明显差异。结论:使用尸体模型和单一病理学家消除了影响外科手术系列中淋巴结转移的许多因素,我们发现个体之间存在很大差异,计数范围从10到53个节点。这些结果证明了淋巴结计数作为解剖范围的替代品的用途有限,并说明了与实施最小淋巴结计数的手术标准相关的挑战。 ? 2013爱思唯尔公司

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号