首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Editorial comment
【24h】

Editorial comment

机译:编辑评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study presents some very interesting findings on several fronts. Firstly it points out that the practice of restaging trans-urethral resection (TUR), which is recommended at least for stage Tl tumors in almost all published guidelines for bladder cancer, is not as widely practiced as one would hope (7.9% of stage Tl patients underwent re-TUR within 60 days). The second finding is that restaging TUR yields a long-tefm survival benefit not only for those with Tl disease but for those with T2 disease! The later observation is befuddling to say the least.
机译:这项研究在几个方面提出了一些非常有趣的发现。首先,它指出,在几乎所有已发表的膀胱癌指南中,建议至少在T1期肿瘤中建议重新行经尿道切除术(TUR),并不像人们希望的那样广泛实施(7.9%的T1期患者在60天内接受了重新TUR)。第二个发现是,重新分期TUR不仅对患有T1疾病的患者而且对于患有T2疾病的患者都产生长期的生存益处!至少可以说,后来的观察令人困惑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号