...
首页> 外文期刊>World trade review >EC-Seal Products: The Tension between Public Morals and International Trade Agreements
【24h】

EC-Seal Products: The Tension between Public Morals and International Trade Agreements

机译:EC密封产品:公共道德与国际贸易协定之间的紧张关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The EC-Seal Products dispute raises fundamental questions about the relationship between public morals and international trade. Can WTO members impose trade restrictions based on moral or ethical concerns? Under what conditions can these concerns trump existing trade liberalization commitments? The dispute was filed in 2009 by Canada and Norway against the EU, which in the same year had banned seal products from being imported and placed on its market. According to the EU, the policy was introduced in response to European moral outrage at the inhumane killing of seals. The EU seal regime included a series of exceptions. In particular, it allowed imports of seal products hunted by Inuit or other indigenous communities, as well as imports of seal products processed and re-exported by EU producers. This article discusses the Appellate Body's ruling in EC-Seal Products and some of the key legal and economic issues raised by this dispute.
机译:EC-Seal产品争议引发了有关公共道德与国际贸易之间关系的根本问题。 WTO成员是否可以基于道德或道德方面的考虑实施贸易限制?在何种情况下这些担忧会胜过现有的贸易自由化承诺?该争端是加拿大和挪威于2009年针对欧盟提起的,欧盟于同年禁止进口密封产品并将其投放市场。根据欧盟的说法,该政策是针对欧洲人对不人道杀害海豹的道德愤慨而推出的。欧盟印章制度包括一系列例外。特别是,它允许进口因纽特人或其他土著社区捕猎的海豹产品,以及由欧盟生产商加工和再出口的海豹产品的进口。本文讨论了上诉机构在EC密封产品中的裁决,以及该争议引发的一些主要法律和经济问题。

著录项

  • 来源
    《World trade review》 |2016年第2期|211-234|共24页
  • 作者

    Conconi Paola; Voon Tania;

  • 作者单位

    Univ Libre Bruxelles, ECARES, Brussels, Belgium|CEPR, London, England;

    Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Law Sch, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号