...
首页> 外文期刊>The World Bank Research Observer >Land Registration, Governance, and Development: Evidence and Implications for Policy
【24h】

Land Registration, Governance, and Development: Evidence and Implications for Policy

机译:土地注册,治理和发展:证据和政策含义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The developmental impact of institutions to establish and maintain secure property rights to land has been a subject of much debate. The authors review the literature on the impact of land administration interventions in specific contexts, highlighting the dependence of outcomes on the governance environment, the effectiveness of the state apparatus, and the distribution of socio-economic power. There is evidence, albeit not uniform, of enhancement of tenure security through land registration with benefits manifesting themselves in higher levels of investment and productivity and a reduced need to defend land rights. Land registration has also been shown to increase activity in land rental markets, leading to higher efficiency overall. Evidence of improved access to credit, due to formalization of land rights, is scant. Even in situations where land registration had positive benefits, the literature contains little rigorous analysis of cost-effectiveness and long-term sustainability of impacts. The authors conclude that formalization of land rights should not be viewed as a panacea and that interventions should be decided only after a careful diagnosis of the policy, social, and governance environment. If intervention is justified, the performance of land administration systems needs to be benchmarked in terms of coverage, cost-effectiveness, and quality of service provision.
机译:建立和维护土地安全产权的机构对发展的影响一直是许多辩论的主题。作者回顾了有关土地管理干预措施在特定情况下的影响的文献,强调了结果对治理环境的依赖,国家机构的有效性以及社会经济实力的分布。有证据表明,尽管不是统一的,但可以通过土地注册来增强土地使用权的安全性,其好处体现在较高的投资和生产率水平以及减少的捍卫土地权利的需求上。土地注册也被证明可以增加土地租赁市场的活动,从而提高整体效率。由于土地权的正规化,改善信贷获取的证据很少。即使在土地注册产生积极收益的情况下,文献也很少对成本效益和影响的长期可持续性进行严格的分析。作者得出的结论是,土地权利的正规化不应被视为万能药,只有在对政策,社会和治理环境进行仔细诊断后,才应决定采取干预措施。如果有理由采取干预措施,则需要在覆盖范围,成本效益和服务质量方面对土地管理系统的性能进行基准测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号