...
首页> 外文期刊>Water Resources Management >Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation System for Low-Impact Development of Urban Stormwater Management Measures
【24h】

Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation System for Low-Impact Development of Urban Stormwater Management Measures

机译:对城市雨水管理措施影响较小的综合效益评价系统

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In recent years, plenty of simulation research about the low impact development(LID) control effect has emerged, but studies on scheme comparison and evaluation are lacking. In this study, a comprehensive benefit evaluation system for LID, including environmental, economic, and social benefits, was established on the basis of Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) and urban storm water model. Above all, benefit identification, quantitative evaluation and scheme comparison of single LID measures were obtained according to site investigation, simulated calculation and theoretical analysis. Whereafter, LID combination plans were designed based on single LID measures with high comprehensive benefit values, and their comprehensive benefits were evaluated to obtain the optimal plan. Then, based on well-founded system combined with Storm Water Management Model (SWMM), the design and optimization of LID were conducted, with a case in Xi'an, China. It turned out that the preferential order of the LID single measures according to the comprehensive benefit was: bio-retention > rain barrels > low-elevation greenbelt > green roofs > permeable pavement. Five LID combination plans were designed based on bio-retention, rain barrels, low-elevation greenbelt, and green roofs. Evaluation results showed that plan I (bio-retention and green roofs) was the optimal LID combination plan.
机译:近年来,关于低影响开发(LID)控制效果的模拟研究已经兴起,但缺乏关于方案比较和评估的研究。本文在层次分析法和城市雨水模型的基础上,建立了包括环境,经济和社会效益在内的LID综合效益评价体系。首先,通过现场调查,模拟计算和理论分析,对单个LID措施进行了收益识别,定量评估和方案比较。然后,基于具有较高综合效益值的单一LID措施设计LID组合计划,并评估其综合收益以获得最佳计划。然后,基于成熟的系统结合雨水管理模型(SWMM),进行了LID的设计和优化,以中国西安为例。结果表明,按照综合效益来看,LID单一措施的优先顺序为:生物滞留>雨桶>低海拔绿化带>屋顶绿化>透水路面。根据生物保留,雨桶,低海拔绿化带和绿色屋顶设计了五个LID组合计划。评价结果表明,方案I(生物保留和绿色屋顶)是最佳的LID组合方案。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Water Resources Management》 |2017年第15期|4745-4758|共14页
  • 作者单位

    Xian Univ Technol, State Key Lab Base Ecohydraul Engn Arid Area, Xian 710048, Shaanxi, Peoples R China;

    Xian Univ Technol, State Key Lab Base Ecohydraul Engn Arid Area, Xian 710048, Shaanxi, Peoples R China;

    Urban Planning & Design Inst Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518028, Peoples R China;

    Xian Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Architecture & Civil Engn, Xian 710054, Shaanxi, Peoples R China;

    Northwest Univ Xian, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Xian 710027, Shaanxi, Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    LID; Comprehensive benefit; Analytic hierarchy process; SWMM;

    机译:LID;综合效益;层次分析法;SWMM;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号