首页> 外文期刊>Water Resources Management >Changes to The Productivity of Water Companies: Comparison of Fully Private and Concessionary Water Companies
【24h】

Changes to The Productivity of Water Companies: Comparison of Fully Private and Concessionary Water Companies

机译:水资源公司生产力的变化:全私有和优惠水公司的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The water industry encompasses a wide variety of water companies operating with different production technologies. This study evaluated and compared changes to the productivity of several fully private water companies (FPWCs) and concessionary water companies (CWCs). Specifically, the cost Malmquist productivity index was estimated by integrating inputs, outputs and environmental variables. A non-parametric approach was used by applying data envelopment analysis. This approach allowed us to quantify the parameters driving changes to productivity as cost efficiency change (technical and allocative efficiency), cost scale efficiency and cost technical change (technical change and input price effect). Through breaking down the cost Malmquist productivity index, relevant information for supporting decision making process by water companies is possible. To further evaluate the impact of water company heterogeneity on productivity change, the changes (convergence versus divergence) to productivity between group and meta-frontiers was estimated. The approach was applied empirically on a sample of 22 water companies in Chile during 2010-2017. The results showed that the productivity of both FPWCs and CWCs improved over time, with FPWCs performing better compared to CWCs. The main drivers of productivity growth for both types of water companies were scale efficiency, technical efficiency and input price effect. Thus, water companies in Chile could improve productivity by moving to a cost-efficient allocation of their resources. The rate of productivity convergence was higher for CWCs compared to FPWCs. The approaches developed in this study provide information that could be used by water managers to better understand what drives productivity and, thus, delineate strategies to improve performance over time.
机译:水产品包括各种各样的水资源公司,运营不同的生产技术。本研究评估并比较了几种全私家水资源公司(FPWCS)和优惠水资源公司(CWCS)的生产率的变化。具体而言,通过集成输入,输出和环境变量来估算成本Malmquist生产力指数。通过应用数据包络分析来使用非参数方法。这种方法使我们能够量化驱动变化的参数,以生产率变化为成本效率变化(技术和分配效率),成本规模效率和成本技术变化(技术变化和输入价格效应)。通过破坏成本的Malmquist生产力指数,可以通过水资源公司支持决策过程的相关信息。为了进一步评估水公司的影响异质性对生产率的变化,估计了组和元边缘之间的生产率的变化(收敛与分歧)。在2010 - 2017年期间,该方法是在智利的22家Water Companies的样本上应用。结果表明,与CWCS相比,FPWCS和CWCS的生产率随着时间的推移而改善,FPWC表现更好。两种类型的水资源公司的生产率增长的主要驱动因素是规模效率,技术效率和投入价格效应。因此,智利的水资源公司通过转向其资源的成本效益分配,可以提高生产力。与FPWC相比,CWC的生产率收敛速率较高。本研究中开发的方法提供了水管理者可以使用的信息,以更好地了解推动生产力的产品,从而划定了随着时间的推移提高性能的策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号