...
首页> 外文期刊>Water Resources Management >Ability Assessment of the Stationary and Cyclostationary Time Series Models to Predict Drought Indices
【24h】

Ability Assessment of the Stationary and Cyclostationary Time Series Models to Predict Drought Indices

机译:能够评估静止和旋涡卷曲时间序列模型预测干旱指数

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Drought forecasting and monitoring play a significant role in reducing the negative effects of global meteorological droughts caused by different intensities at different temporal and spatial scales in different regions, especially in regions with high dependency on rainwater. The present study tries to compare the accuracy of stationary time series (ST) models including autoregressive moving average (ARMA), moving average (MA) and autoregressive (AR) and cyclostationary time series (CT) models including periodic autoregressive moving average (PARMA), periodic moving average (PMA) and periodic autoregressive (PAR) to predict drought index (i.e. monthly reconnaissance drought index (RDI)) in periodic data series considering that CT models are more powerful and efficient than ST models by using data series of 8 synoptic stations with different climate conditions in Iran from 1967 to 2017. According to the results the monthly RDI was significantly periodic in all selected stations. The PAR (25) model was the best fitted CT model in data series at all stations and on the other hand, the following models were the best-fitted ST models in data series: the AR models at Babolsar and Rasht AR (25) and at Gorgan AR (24) and ARMA models at Tehran ARMA (2, 3), at Zahedan and Shiraz ARMA (2, 4) and at Esfahan and Shahre Kord ARMA (2, 5). Based on the best fitted CT and ST models, the results showed that the correlation coefficients (R) between observed and simulated RDI vary from 0.882 to 0.946 and from 0.693 to 0.874, respectively from January 1967 to December 2017. According to the best fitted CT and ST models, the validation test of the best fitted models indicated that the R between observed and simulated RDI vary from 0.634 to 0.883 and 0.585 to 0.847, respectively from January 2012 to December 2017. In total, it can be concluded that that the accuracy and capability of CT models in predicting the RDI were more than those of the ST models at all stations and the hypothesis of the study was confirmed.
机译:干旱预测和监测在减少不同时间和空间鳞片中不同地区的不同强度造成的全球气象干旱的负面影响,特别是在具有高依赖性的地区的地区。本研究试图比较包括自回归移动平均(ARMA),移动平均(MA)和自回归(AR)和Cycrationary时间序列(CT)模型的精确度,包括周期性自回归移动平均线(Parma) ,定期移动平均(PMA)和周期性自回归(PAR),以预测干旱指数(即,定期数据序列中的干旱指数(即每月侦察干旱指数(RDI))考虑到CT型号通过使用8个Synoptic的数据系列比ST模型更强大和高效1967年至2017年,伊朗与伊朗不同气候条件的电台。根据结果,每月RDI在所有选定站中都会定期定期。 PAR(25)模型是所有站点数据系列中最适合的CT模型,另一方面,以下型号是数据系列中最合适的ST模型:Babolsar和Rasht AR(25)的AR模型(​​25)在Gorgan Ar(24)和德黑兰Arma(2,3)的Arma Models,位于Zahedan和Shiraz Arma(2,4)和埃斯法罕和沙德尔Kord Arma(2,5)。基于最佳拟合CT和ST模型,结果表明,观测和模拟RDI之间的相关系数(R)分别在0.882至0.946和0.693至0.874之间,分别于1967年1月至2017年12月。根据最佳合适的CT和ST模型,最佳拟合模型的验证测试表明,观察和模拟的RDI之间的r分别从2012年1月到2017年1月的0.634到0.883和0.585至0.847。总的来说,可以得出结论,即准确性在预测RDI时,CT模型的能力远远超过所有站的ST模型,并确认了该研究的假设。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号