首页> 外文期刊>Water Research >Membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment - A viable option to reduce the amount of polar pollutants discharged into surface waters?
【24h】

Membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment - A viable option to reduce the amount of polar pollutants discharged into surface waters?

机译:用于市政废水处理的膜生物反应器-减少排放到地表水中的极性污染物数量的可行选择?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The potential of a lab-scale membrane bioreactor (MBR) to remove polar pollutants from municipal wastewater was studied for industrial and household chemicals over a period of 22 months parallel to a conventional activated sludge (CAS) treatment. For half of the compounds, such as benzotriazole, 5-tolyltriazole (5-TTri), benzothiazole-2-sulfonate and 1,6-naphthalene disulfonate (1,6-NDSA), removal by MBR was significantly better than in CAS, while no improvement was recorded for the other half (1,5-NDSA, 1,3-NDSA, 4-TTri and naphthalene-1-sulfonate). The influence of operational conditions on trace pollutant removal by MBR was studied but no significant effects were found for variation of hydraulic retention time (7 h-14 h) and sludge retention time (26 d-102 d), suggesting that the lowest values selected have already been high enough for good removal. It is shown that the seemingly inconsistent results reported here and in previous studies regarding the comparison of trace pollutant removal in MBR and CAS are highly consistent. MBR is neither superior for well degradable compounds that are already extensively degraded in CAS treatment nor for recalcitrant compounds that are not amenable to biodegradation. For most compounds of intermediate removal in CAS treatment (15-80%), among them phar-maceuticals, personal care products and industrial chemicals, the MBR is clearly superior and reduces the effluent concentration by 20-50%. Despite of this clear benefit of MBR, the effect is not pronounced enough to serve as a sole argument for employing MBR in municipal wastewater treatment.
机译:在22个月的时间内,研究了实验室规模的膜生物反应器(MBR)从市政废水中去除极性污染物的潜力,与传统的活性污泥(CAS)处理平行。对于一半化合物,例如苯并三唑,5-甲苯基三唑(5-TTri),苯并噻唑-2-磺酸盐和1,6-萘二磺酸盐(1,6-NDSA),MBR的去除效果明显优于CAS,而另一半(1,5-NDSA,1,3-NDSA,4-TTri和萘-1-磺酸盐)未见改善。研究了操作条件对MBR去除痕量污染物的影响,但对水力停留时间(7 h-14 h)和污泥停留时间(26 d-102 d)的变化没有显着影响,表明选择的最低值已经足够高,可以很好地清除了。结果表明,这里和以前的研究报告的关于MBR和CAS中痕量污染物去除的比较结果似乎不一致。 MBR既不适用于在CAS处理中已被大量降解的可降解化合物,也不适用于无法进行生物降解的难降解化合物。对于大多数CAS处理中的中间去除化合物(15-80%),其中包括药物,个人护理产品和工业化学品,MBR明显优越,可将废水浓度降低20-50%。尽管MBR具有明显的好处,但其效果还不足以作为将MBR用于市政废水处理的唯一理由。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号