...
首页> 外文期刊>Water Research >Evaluation of methods to sample fecal indicator bacteria in foreshore sand and pore water at freshwater beaches
【24h】

Evaluation of methods to sample fecal indicator bacteria in foreshore sand and pore water at freshwater beaches

机译:淡水海滩前沙和孔隙水中粪便指示菌取样方法的评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) are known to accumulate in foreshore beach sand and pore water (referred to as foreshore reservoir) where they act as a non-point source for contaminating adjacent surface waters. While guidelines exist for sampling surface waters at recreational beaches, there is no widely-accepted method to collect sand/sediment or pore water samples for FIB enumeration. The effect of different sampling strategies in quantifying the abundance of FIB in the foreshore reservoir is unclear. Sampling was conducted at six freshwater beaches with different sand types to evaluate sampling methods for characterizing the abundance of E. coli in the foreshore reservoir as well as the partitioning of E. coli between different components in the foreshore reservoir (pore water, saturated sand, unsaturated sand). Methods were evaluated for collection of pore water (drive point, shovel, and careful excavation), unsaturated sand (top 1 cm, top 5 cm), and saturated sand (sediment core, shovel, and careful excavation). Ankle-depth surface water samples were also collected for comparison. Pore water sampled with a shovel resulted in the highest observed E. coli concentrations (only statistically significant at fine sand beaches) and lowest variability compared to other sampling methods. Collection of the top 1 cm of unsaturated sand resulted in higher and more variable concentrations than the top 5 cm of sand. There were no statistical differences in E. coli concentrations when using different methods to sample the saturated sand. Overall, the unsaturated sand had the highest amount of E. coli when compared to saturated sand and pore water (considered on a bulk volumetric basis). The findings presented will help determine the appropriate sampling strategy for characterizing FIB abundance in the foreshore reservoir as a means of predicting its potential impact on nearshore surface water quality and public health risk. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:已知粪便指示菌(FIB)会积聚在前滩的沙滩和孔隙水(称为前水库)中,在那里它们会作为污染邻近地表水的非点源。尽管存在用于休闲海滩地表水采样的准则,但没有广泛接受的方法来收集沙子/沉积物或孔隙水样本以进行FIB枚举。目前尚不清楚在量化前滨水库中FIB丰度时采用不同采样策略的效果。在六个具有不同沙子类型的淡水海滩进行了采样,以评估用于表征前滩水库中大肠杆菌含量以及前滩水库中不同成分之间的大肠杆菌分配(孔隙水,饱和砂,不饱和砂)。评估了收集孔隙水(驱动点,铲子和小心开挖),非饱和砂(顶部1 cm,顶部5 cm)和饱和砂(沉积芯,铲子和小心开挖)的方法。还收集了脚踝深度的地表水样品以进行比较。与其他采样方法相比,用铁锹采样的孔隙水导致最高的观察到的大肠杆菌浓度(仅在细沙滩上具有统计学意义)和最低的变异性。收集顶部1 cm的非饱和砂比顶部5 cm的砂产生更高和更多的浓度。当使用不同的方法对饱和砂进行采样时,大肠杆菌浓度没有统计学差异。总体而言,与饱和沙子和孔隙水相比(以体积计),不饱和沙子的大肠杆菌含量最高。提出的发现将有助于确定表征前滨水库中FIB丰度的适当采样策略,以预测其对近岸地表水水质和公共卫生风险的潜在影响。 (C)2017 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Water Research》 |2017年第15期|204-212|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Western Ontario, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada;

    Environm Canada, Canada Ctr Inland Waters, Burlington, ON L7S 1A1, Canada;

    Univ Western Ontario, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada|Univ New South Wales, Connected Water Inst, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Manly Vale, NSW 2093, Australia;

    Univ Miami, Dept Civil Architectural & Environm Engn, Coral Gables, FL 33146 USA;

    Univ Western Ontario, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada;

    Univ Western Ontario, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    E. coli; Sand; Sampling methods; Beaches; Recreational water quality;

    机译:大肠杆菌;沙;采样方法;海滩;娱乐水质;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号