首页> 外文期刊>Water, air and soil pollution >Holistic Assessment of Biochar and Brown Coal Waste as Organic Amendments in Sustainable Environmental and Agricultural Applications
【24h】

Holistic Assessment of Biochar and Brown Coal Waste as Organic Amendments in Sustainable Environmental and Agricultural Applications

机译:生物炭和棕色煤矸石的整体评价为可持续环境和农业应用中的有机修正

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Organic amendments can improve soil quality which has knock-on environmental and agronomic benefits. However, the use of new and emerging organic amendments such as biochar and brown coal waste (BCW) in soil systems requires continuous holistic assessments for robust consensus building in their environmental and agricultural applications. To examine the application of BCW and woodchip biochar (BIO) in agroecosystems, secondary data from literature on environmental (soil, air and water) aspects were compiled with primary agronomic data from a 3-year multicropping field trial and collated with supplementary data on economic factors (e.g. cost and availability). For the field trial, replicated plots were amended with FYM (for comparative reasons), BCW and BIO at 30, 24.2 and 12.8 for t ha(-1), respectively, with and without NPK and cultivated in a cropping sequence of maize, potato and barley. At the end of each season, soils were characterised for pH, cation exchange capacity (CEC) and fertility (macronutrient contents) in addition to nutrient uptake, nutritional quality and yield of crops. Compared with FYM, biochar and BCW were found to be associated with greater improvements in soil quality (e.g. building of soil structure and C sequestration) and knock-on water and air quality benefits mainly facilitated via increased cation retention and humic-linked sorption which abated gaseous emission and mitigated nutrient and heavy metal leaching. These along with variable improvements in soil chemistry, fertility and nutrient uptake in the agronomic field trial accounted for increased mean crop yield across treatments (higher with NPK): FYM (32.7 and 71.7%), BCW (33.5 and 60.1%) and BIO (21.8 and 48.2%). Additionally, biochar and BCW have lower pollutant (e.g. heavy metals) contents and were found to provide additional sustainability and net abatement cost-benefits. While the agronomic benefits of biochar and BCW were slightly lower compared with that of FYM, their lower environmental footprints and associated sustainability benefits are clear advantages for their adoption in environmental and agricultural applications.
机译:有机修正案可以提高土壤质量,这些质量有敲门环境和农艺效益。然而,在土壤系统中使用新的和新兴有机修正案如生物炭和棕色煤矸石(BCW)需要在环境和农业应用中的强大共识建设中持续整体评估。要检查BCW和Woodchip生物炭(BIO)在农业中的应用,来自环境(土壤,空气和水)方面的文献中的次要数据与来自3年的多级现场审判的原发性农艺数据编制,并与经济补充数据进行了整理因素(例如成本和可用性)。对于现场试验,将复制的图分别在30,24.2和12.8分别使用FYM(以比较原因),BCW和BIO,分别为T HA(-1),其中没有NPK,并以玉米,马铃薯的种植序列培养和大麦。在每个季节结束时,除了营养吸收,营养质量和作物产量之外,土壤的特征是pH,阳离子交换能力(CEC)和生育率(Macronutrient含量)。与FYM,生物炭和BCW相比,发现与土壤质量的更大提高相关(例如土壤结构和C封存),并通过增加阳离子保留和腐殖质连接的吸附来促进水分和空气质量效益。气体排放和缓解营养和重金属浸出。这些以及土壤化学的可变改善,农艺田间试验中的生育和营养吸收占治疗的平均作物产量增加(NPK更高):FYM(32.7和71.7%),BCW(33.5和60.1%)和生物( 21.8和48.2%)。此外,Biochar和BCW具有较低的污染物(例如重金属)内容,并发现提供额外的可持续性和净减排成本效益。虽然与FYM相比,Biochar和BCW的农艺效益略低,但其较低的环境足迹和相关的可持续性效益是在环境和农业应用中采用的明显优势。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号