...
首页> 外文期刊>Waste Management >Environmental assessment of energy production from anaerobic digestion of pig manure at medium-scale using life cycle assessment
【24h】

Environmental assessment of energy production from anaerobic digestion of pig manure at medium-scale using life cycle assessment

机译:生命周期评估中规模猪粪厌氧消化产生能量的环境评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study assessed the potential environmental effects of energy production from pig manure treatment by anaerobic digestion at medium-scale based on the Life Cycle Assessment of a farm in Puebla, Mexico. It also compared the results from common practices of biogas flaring and conventional management. The analysis was based on one ton of pig manure in 4 systems: two with energy production, one with biogas flaring, and the last one conventional management. The use of biogas for electricity production combined with composting techniques generated the lowest net impacts on climate change of 272 kg C02eq and photochemical oxidation of 0.056 kg ethylene eq, while the biogas flaring registered impacts of 344 kg C02eq and 0.095 kg ethylene eq. The systems with energy production had environmental benefits on fossil resources depletion by avoiding the consumption of -863 MJ and -1608 MJ, but systems that burned biogas required fossil fuel consumption of 246 MJ from the grid. The conventional management generated the greatest environmental impacts, with eutrophication being the most important negative effect due to the manure discharge into water bodies (5.97 kg PO_4eq). Sensitivity analysis shown that energy production could generate greater impacts on global warming compared to the case in which manure was used directly in crop fields, if emissions from unintentional releases and a poor digestate management are not avoided. Results are relevant for developing countries in which processes are carried out in rural and semi-industrial areas with lack of technical knowledge and economic resources.
机译:这项研究基于墨西哥普埃布拉(Puebla)一家农场的生命周期评估,通过中等规模的厌氧消化评估了猪粪处理产生的能量对能源生产的潜在环境影响。它还比较了沼气燃烧和常规管理的常规做法的结果。该分析基于4个系统中的一吨猪粪:两个系统产生能量,一个系统燃烧沼气,最后一个系统常规处理。将沼气用于电力生产与堆肥技术相结合,对气候变化的净影响最低,为272千克二氧化碳当量,光化学氧化为0.056千克乙烯当量,而燃烧的沼气则产生了344千克二氧化碳当量和0.095千克乙烯当量的影响。能源生产的系统避免了-863 MJ和-1608 MJ的消耗,对化石资源的消耗具有环境效益,但是燃烧沼气的系统需要从电网消耗246 MJ的化石燃料。常规管理对环境的影响最大,由于粪便排入水体(5.97 kg PO_4eq),富营养化是最重要的负面影响。敏感性分析表明,如果避免避免无意排放和不良消化管理产生的排放,与直接将粪肥用于作物田的情况相比,能源生产对全球变暖的影响更大。结果对于在缺乏技术知识和经济资源的农村和半工业区进行处理的发展中国家而言是有意义的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号