首页> 外文期刊>Waste management & research >The impact of socioeconomic factors on municipal solid waste generation in Sao Paulo, Brazil
【24h】

The impact of socioeconomic factors on municipal solid waste generation in Sao Paulo, Brazil

机译:社会经济因素对巴西圣保罗城市固体废物产生的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Social factors have not been sufficiently explored in municipal solid waste management studies. Latin America has produced even fewer studies with this approach; technical and economic investigations have prevailed. We explored the impacts of socioeconomic factors on municipal solid waste generation in Greater Sao Paulo, which includes 39 municipalities. We investigated the relations between municipal solid waste generation and social factors by Pearson's correlation coefficient. The Student's t-test (at p < 0.01) proved significance, and further regression analysis was performed with significant factors. We considered 10 socioeconomic factors: population, rural population, density, life expectancy, education (secondary, high and undergraduate level), income per capita, inequality and human development. A later multicollinearity analysis resulted in the determination of inequality (r_p = 0.625) and income per capita (r_p = 0.607) as major drivers. The results showed the relevance of considering social aspects in municipal solid waste management and isolated inequality as an important factor in planning. Inequality must be used as a complementary factor to income, rather than being used exclusively. Inequality may explain differences of waste generation between areas with similar incomes because of consumption patterns. Therefore, unequal realities demand unequal measures to avoid exacerbation, for example, pay-as-you-throw policies instead of uniform fees. Unequal realities also highlight the importance of tiering policies beyond the waste sector, such as sustainable consumption.
机译:在城市固体废物管理研究中尚未充分探讨社会因素。拉丁美洲通过这种方法进行的研究甚至更少。技术和经济调查占了上风。我们探讨了社会经济因素对大保罗州(包括39个城市)的城市固体废物产生的影响。我们通过皮尔逊相关系数研究了城市固体废物产生与社会因素之间的关系。学生t检验(p <0.01)证明具有显着性,并使用重要因素进行了进一步的回归分析。我们考虑了10个社会经济因素:人口,农村人口,人口密度,预期寿命,受教育程度(中等,高中和大学水平),人均收入,不平等和人类发展。后来的多重共线性分析导致确定不平等(r_p = 0.625)和人均收入(r_p = 0.607)是主要驱动力。结果表明,在城市固体废物管理中考虑社会因素和孤立的不平等是进行规划的重要因素的相关性。不平等必须被用来作为收入的补充因素,而不是仅仅被使用。不平等可以解释由于消费方式不同而在具有相似收入的地区之间产生废物的差异。因此,不平等的现实要求采取不平等的措施来避免情况恶化,例如,采用即付即付政策代替统一收费。不平等的现实也凸显了将政策划分到废物部门之外的重要性,例如可持续消费。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号