首页> 外文期刊>Urban Studies >Cities in an era of interfacing infrastructures: Politics and spatialities of the urban nexus
【24h】

Cities in an era of interfacing infrastructures: Politics and spatialities of the urban nexus

机译:基础设施接口时代的城市:城市联系的政治和空间

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Over the last few years, nexus-thinking has become a buzzword in urban research and practice. This also applies to recent claims of greater integration or coordination of urban infrastructures that have traditionally been managed separately and have been unbundled. The idea is to better address their growing sociotechnical complexity, their externalities and their operation within an urban system of systems. This article introduces a collection of case studies aimed at critically appraising how concepts of nexus and infrastructure integration have become guiding visions for the development of green, resilient or smart cities. It assesses how concepts of nexus and calls for higher interconnectivity and 'co-management' within and across infrastructure domains often forestall more politically informed discussions and downplay potential risks and institutional restrictions. Based on an urban political and sociotechnical approach, the introduction to this special issue centres around four major research gaps: 1) the tensions between calls for infrastructure re-bundling and the urban trends and realities driven by infrastructure restructuring since the 1990s; 2) the existing boundary work in cities and urban stakeholders' practices in bringing fragmented urban infrastructures together; 3) the politics involved in infrastructural and urban change and in aligning urban infrastructures that often defy managerial rhetoric of resource efficiency, smartness and resilience; and 4) the spatialities at play in infrastructural reconfigurations that selectively promote specific spaces and scales of metabolic autonomy, system operation (and failure), networked interconnectivities and system regulation. We conclude by outlining directions for future research.
机译:在过去的几年中,思维联系已成为城市研究和实践中的流行语。这也适用于最近声称对城市基础设施进行更大程度的整合或协调的主张,而传统上这些城市基础设施是分开管理的,并且不捆绑销售。这个想法是为了更好地解决他们日益增长的社会技术复杂性,外部性以及它们在城市系统系统中的运行。本文介绍了一系列案例研究,旨在严格评估联系和基础设施集成的概念如何成为绿色,弹性或智慧城市发展的指导性愿景。它评估了联系的概念,并呼吁在基础架构域内和跨域进行更高的互连性和“共同管理”,这通常会阻止更多具有政治知情的讨论,并且轻描淡写潜在的风险和机构限制。本期专刊以城市政治和社会技术方法为基础,围绕四个主要研究空白:1)自1990年代以来,基础设施重新捆绑的呼声与基础设施重组推动的城市趋势和现实之间的紧张关系; 2)城市现有的边界工作和城市利益相关者将分散的城市基础设施整合在一起的做法; 3)涉及基础设施和城市变化以及调整城市基础设施的政治,这些政治往往无视管理人员对资源效率,智慧和应变能力的言论; 4)基础结构重构中的空间性,选择性地促进代谢自主性,系统运行(和故障),网络互连性和系统调节的特定空间和规模。最后,我们概述了未来研究的方向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号