首页> 外文期刊>Urban Policy and Research >Planning Appeals: Are Third Party Rights Legitimate? The Case Study of Victoria, Australia
【24h】

Planning Appeals: Are Third Party Rights Legitimate? The Case Study of Victoria, Australia

机译:规划申诉:第三方权利是否合法?澳大利亚维多利亚的案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

One of the contemporary debates in urban policy is the question of public participation in planning processes. In some jurisdictions, demands for greater public participation have impacted planning processes through a widening of appeal rights to allow third party appeals. However, in many jurisdictions both in Australia and overseas third party appeals are still not recognised or permitted only in very limited circumstances. This article explores the debate surrounding third party appeals and, in the context of a case study of Victoria, examines the arguments for and against a widening of planning appeal rights.
机译:关于城市政策的当代辩论之一是公众参与规划过程的问题。在某些司法管辖区,要求公众更多参与的要求通过扩大上诉权以允许第三方上诉而影响了规划流程。但是,在澳大利亚和海外的许多司法管辖区中,仅在非常有限的情况下,仍不承认或不允许第三方上诉。本文探讨了围绕第三方上诉的辩论,并以维多利亚为例,研究了支持和反对扩大计划上诉权的论点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号