首页> 外文期刊>Urban affairs review >Defending Gentrification as a Valid Collective Conception: Utilizing the Metanarrative of 'Suburbia' as a Common Axis for the Diversity of Middle-Class Reurbanization Projects
【24h】

Defending Gentrification as a Valid Collective Conception: Utilizing the Metanarrative of 'Suburbia' as a Common Axis for the Diversity of Middle-Class Reurbanization Projects

机译:防御绅士策略作为有效的集体概念:利用“郊区”的MetanArtation作为中产阶级止血项目的多样性的共同轴

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A long-standing problem in gentrification research is the increasingly diverse array of interests and agendas in the renewal of the inner city; their diversity has frustrated many scholars with respect to the collective characterization and comprehension of the phenomenon. Consequently, others have questioned the validity of the term "gentrification" itself. This article contends that gentrification is a phenomenon that merits being collectively identified. The relocation of the middle class to the urban core has been portrayed in terms of actors and agendas, places and processes. These criteria have long since been inadequate to collectively rationalize gentrification in anything other than strictly spatial terms. But when suburbia is perceived as a metanarrative, the collective character of gentrification becomes evident; for it is the process of the metanarrative's systemic erosion in the postmodern era that serves the long-standing desire to find an operant commonality to gentrification's apparent lack of coherence.
机译:绅士化研究中的长期问题是内城更新中日益多样化的兴趣和议程;他们的多样性对集体表征和对现象的理解感到沮丧。因此,其他人质疑术语“Gentrification”本身的有效性。本文争辩说,绅士统治是一种符合集体识别的现象。在参与者和议程,地点和流程方面,已经描绘了中产阶级到城市核心的搬迁。这些标准长期以来,由于严格的空间条款以外的任何内容,才能集体合理化更加合理化。但是当郊区被认为是一个常规时,绅士化的集体特征变得明显;因为它是MetanArtative在后现代时代的系统侵蚀的过程,用于寻找常见的普通态度,以便更加普遍缺乏连贯性的渴望。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号