首页> 外文期刊>Transportation >A comparison of users' characteristics between station-based bikesharing system and free-floating bikesharing system: case study in Hangzhou, China
【24h】

A comparison of users' characteristics between station-based bikesharing system and free-floating bikesharing system: case study in Hangzhou, China

机译:基于站点的共享单车系统和自由浮动的共享单车系统的用户特征比较:以中国杭州为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The paper takes station-based bikesharing system (SBS) with docks and dockless free-floating bikesharing system (FBS) as two targets to dig out the relationship between users and use frequency of the services for each scheme, and how the relationship varies from scheme to scheme. To achieve this, studies are carried out focusing on three questions: "who are using these two bicycle services?"; "what are the factors influencing the use frequency of both bicycle systems?"; and "which specific level of the factors influencing the use frequency of both bicycle schemes?" To collect data from users, a survey was designed containing questions for user attributes and service experience and conducted jointly on-line and on-site at four locations with mixed land use in Hangzhou, China. Analysis results show that SBS and FBS have similar user structure but different factors influence use frequency. Based on analysis results, from the user perspective, SBS's strength is to have good quality with low cost while FBS is more flexible and free to use. Finally, recommendations for SBS are to involve more technology to expand its range to aided bikes for senior citizens and open the access for a mobile renting system, whereas for FBS, it is critical to get government cooperation and for operators to add parking area restrictions into the cellphone application, and create an on-line platform where users can find all the free-floating bike information.
机译:本文以具有码头和无码头自由浮动自行车共享系统(FBS)的基于站点的自行车共享系统(SBS)为两个目标,以挖掘用户之间的关系以及每种方案的服务使用频率,以及该关系如何随方案变化计划。为了实现这一目标,针对以下三个问题进行了研究:“谁在使用这两种自行车服务?”; “影响两个自行车系统使用频率的因素有哪些?”;和“影响这两种自行车使用频率的因素的哪个具体水平?”为了从用户那里收集数据,设计了一个包含用户属性和服务体验问题的调查,并在中国杭州的四个土地混合使用的地方进行了在线和现场联合调查。分析结果表明,SBS和FBS具有相似的用户结构,但不同的因素影响使用频率。根据分析结果,从用户的角度来看,SBS的优势是要以低成本提供高质量的产品,而FBS则更灵活且可以免费使用。最后,对SBS的建议是涉及更多技术,以扩大其范围,以扩展至老年人专用自行车,并开放用于移动租赁系统的通道,而对于FBS,获得政府合作和运营商将停车位限制添加到其中至关重要。手机应用程序,并创建一个在线平台,用户可以在其中找到所有自由浮动的自行车信息。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Transportation》 |2020年第2期|689-704|共16页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位

    Zhejiang Univ Coll Civil Engn & Architecture Polytech Inst 866 Yuhangtang Rd Hangzhou 310058 Peoples R China;

    Univ Laval Ecole Super Amenagement Terr & Dev Reg Pavillon Felix Antoine Savard 2325 Quebec City PQ G1V 0A6 Canada;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Station-based bikesharing; Free-floating bikesharing; User characteristics; Use frequency; Ordinal logistic analysis;

    机译:基于站点的自行车共享;自由浮动的自行车共享;用户特征;使用频率;顺序物流分析;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号