...
首页> 外文期刊>Transportation Research >How much should gasoline be taxed when electric vehicles conquer the market? An analysis of the mismatch between efficient and existing gasoline taxes under emerging electric mobility
【24h】

How much should gasoline be taxed when electric vehicles conquer the market? An analysis of the mismatch between efficient and existing gasoline taxes under emerging electric mobility

机译:电动汽车征服市场时应向汽油征税多少?新兴电动出行下高效汽油税与现有汽油税之间的不匹配分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The taxation of gasoline is characterized by large variability across countries and recent research has analyzed existing gasoline tax levels from an economic efficiency point of view focusing on conventional internal combustion engine vehicles. Most studies find that existing fuel tax rates do not coincide with economically efficient levels. As long as policy-makers do not take action to reduce the resulting efficiency gap, there will be an ongoing welfare loss to the economy. However, the composition of passenger car fleets will probably be subject to fundamental changes in the (near) future due to the emergence of electric mobility. This raises the question of whether the mismatch between current and efficient fuel taxation will persist, shrink, or even exacerbate under emerging electric mobility. This paper aims at answering this question by determining the structure and level of optimal gasoline taxes in the presence of electric vehicles (EVs). First, the optimal (nationwide) gasoline tax is analytically derived employing a general equilibrium approach. It is shown that differences in traffic related marginal external costs among fuel powered cars and EVs affect the corrective Pigouvian component of the optimal gasoline tax while a differential tax treatment influences the fiscal rational of the tax. Second, the model is applied to Germany using differentiated data on e.g. external costs and behavioral responses. Under a wide range of scenarios, the present analyses indicate a strong relationship between optimal gasoline taxes and electric mobility, calling for a downward adjustment of efficient gasoline taxes. The effect is mainly driven by financial incentives for purchasing and using EVs. Since fuel is likely to be undertaxed in many countries, the emergence of electric mobility will therefore close the gap between gasoline taxes in place and economically efficient taxes. On the other side, it will increase the efficiency gap in those countries where gasoline is overtaxed. This also has important implications for policy concerned with environmental objectives. Pushing electric mobility seriously and at the same time taxing gasoline efficiently could actually prevent sufficient CO2 emission savings. However, at least in the case of Germany, even a downward adjusted optimal gasoline tax under electric mobility is likely to be higher than the current (non-optimal) tax. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:汽油税的特点是各国之间差异很大,最近的研究从经济效率的角度分析了现有的汽油税水平,重点是常规内燃机汽车。大多数研究发现,现有的燃油税率与经济效率水平不符。只要决策者不采取行动缩小由此产生的效率差距,经济就会蒙受持续的福利损失。然而,由于电动汽车的出现,乘用车车队的组成可能会在不久的将来发生根本变化。这就提出了一个问题,即在新兴的电动交通中,当前燃油税与有效燃油税之间的不匹配是否会持续,缩小甚至加剧。本文旨在通过确定存在电动汽车(EV)的最佳汽油税的结构和水平来回答这个问题。首先,最优(全国性)汽油税是采用一般均衡方法分析得出的。结果表明,与燃料相关的汽车和电动汽车与交通相关的边际外部成本的差异会影响最优汽油税的纠正性庇古维组成部分,而差异性税收待遇会影响税收的财政合理性。其次,该模型使用例如外部成本和行为反应。在各种各样的情况下,本分析表明,最佳汽油税与电动汽车出行之间存在很强的关系,要求向下调整有效汽油税。影响主要是由购买和使用电动汽车的财政激励措施驱动的。由于在许多国家,燃油可能会被征税,因此电动交通的出现将缩小汽油税与经济有效税之间的差距。另一方面,这将增加汽油税过高的国家的效率差距。这对于与环境目标有关的政策也具有重要意义。认真推动电动交通并同时对汽油征税实际上可能会阻止大量的二氧化碳排放量节省。但是,至少在德国,即使在电动汽车通行的情况下向下调整的最优汽油税也可能会高于当前(非最优)税。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号